Re: ACLs in a jail ... not usable?
On Wednesday 18 April 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > --On Tuesday, April 17, 2007 22:38:45 -0400 Anish Mistry > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 April 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> Just want to make sure there isn't something I'm missing, but it > >> apears ACLs aren't settable from within a jail? > >> > >> # setfacl -m g:mail:rwx Login.1 > >> setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported > > > > ACLs work fine in jails. Are you sure you enabled ACLs on the > > filesystem? > > Great, knew it couldn't be *that* easy :( > > At what point do I have to enable them? I figured 'if getfacl > worked, setfacl would too': > > # getfacl cvsupd.core > #file:cvsupd.core > #owner:0 > #group:0 > user::rw- > group::--- > other::--- > > Apparently not ... ? > > A quick look at tunefs, I see the -a option ... I take it -a enable > is all I have to do to the file system to enable ACLs? Yes, or you could also add the acls options to your fstab. eg. /dev/mirror/gm0s1h /usr/jail/hosting ufs rw,userquota,groupquota,acls2 2 > > Thanks ... > > > > > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: > hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -- Anish Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] AM Productions http://am-productions.biz/ pgpFtX7C81olg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ACLs in a jail ... not usable?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, April 17, 2007 22:38:45 -0400 Anish Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Just want to make sure there isn't something I'm missing, but it >> apears ACLs aren't settable from within a jail? >> >> # setfacl -m g:mail:rwx Login.1 >> setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported > ACLs work fine in jails. Are you sure you enabled ACLs on the > filesystem? Great, knew it couldn't be *that* easy :( At what point do I have to enable them? I figured 'if getfacl worked, setfacl would too': # getfacl cvsupd.core #file:cvsupd.core #owner:0 #group:0 user::rw- group::--- other::--- Apparently not ... ? A quick look at tunefs, I see the -a option ... I take it -a enable is all I have to do to the file system to enable ACLs? Thanks ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGJaHA4QvfyHIvDvMRAu+3AJ9cy4CQKy6rh1vdViipRrbE7FrqngCgxr5L A/HVQRUeu7JnvOihVLck96c= =2LO8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ACLs in a jail ... not usable?
On Tuesday 17 April 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Just want to make sure there isn't something I'm missing, but it > apears ACLs aren't settable from within a jail? > > # setfacl -m g:mail:rwx Login.1 > setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported ACLs work fine in jails. Are you sure you enabled ACLs on the filesystem? -- Anish Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] AM Productions http://am-productions.biz/ pgpRuWOK2AWQ6.pgp Description: PGP signature
ACLs in a jail ... not usable?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just want to make sure there isn't something I'm missing, but it apears ACLs aren't settable from within a jail? # setfacl -m g:mail:rwx Login.1 setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported Thanks ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGJX4P4QvfyHIvDvMRAmzJAJsFVYyl33FbkZem/EBiCfrmBt4l0gCg3zot XVf5NIZRg/x8X8izRSda52o= =Zn8O -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
