Re: .wma music files (amd64 woes...)

2005-10-16 Thread Bill Schoolcraft

At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:


Bill Schoolcraft wrote:

At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:


Bill Schoolcraft wrote:


Gr, is there a list of all the ports that don't work on
AMD64 machines?  I just attempted to install the above :(



http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/

I checked there for the xmms-wma port although I did not find it. Post the 
errors that occurred and someone may be able to help.


-Mark



Thanks Mark,

Here is all that happened:

#

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/audio/xmms-wma]- make install

===  xmms-wma-1.0.4_2 is only for i386, and you are running amd64.

#



Oh okay. See what Andrew said then (that it's only for i386). I guess it 
won't work, sorry :(


Do you see all/any of this getting resolved with the release of 6.0 ?

This of course is not the first port that has this limitation.
I was really stoked to get my first amd64 with 1-gig of ram, I
had no idea that these bumps would occur.  I run 5.4 on i386 and
it was that experience that led me to get the 64bit box.

I have it triple booted with FreeBSD-5.4/WinXP-Pro/SuSE-9.3
but keep it booted into BSD to keep the faith!

--
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076
San Francisco, CA 94121
http://billschoolcraft.com
 ~
You do best what you like most.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: .wma music files (amd64 woes...)

2005-10-16 Thread Andrew P.
On 10/17/05, Bill Schoolcraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:

  Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
  At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:
 
  Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
 
  Gr, is there a list of all the ports that don't work on
  AMD64 machines?  I just attempted to install the above :(
 
 
  http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/
 
  I checked there for the xmms-wma port although I did not find it. Post the
  errors that occurred and someone may be able to help.
 
  -Mark
 
 
  Thanks Mark,
 
  Here is all that happened:
 
  #
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/audio/xmms-wma]- make install
 
  ===  xmms-wma-1.0.4_2 is only for i386, and you are running amd64.
 
  #
 
 
  Oh okay. See what Andrew said then (that it's only for i386). I guess it
  won't work, sorry :(

 Do you see all/any of this getting resolved with the release of 6.0 ?

 This of course is not the first port that has this limitation.
 I was really stoked to get my first amd64 with 1-gig of ram, I
 had no idea that these bumps would occur.  I run 5.4 on i386 and
 it was that experience that led me to get the 64bit box.

 I have it triple booted with FreeBSD-5.4/WinXP-Pro/SuSE-9.3
 but keep it booted into BSD to keep the faith!

 --
 Bill Schoolcraft
 PO Box 210076
 San Francisco, CA 94121
 http://billschoolcraft.com
   ~
 You do best what you like most.

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



It's not a problem with FreeBSD, really. The ports
themselves should get to work under amd64.

2006 will probably become the year of widespread
adoption of 64-bit computing. Until it ends, you'd
better use FreeBSD/i386 on your desktops. All
server software that was popular enough was
ensured to run on FreeBSD/amd64 smoothly.

The situation is not much better with Linux, and
even worse with Windows.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: .wma music files (amd64 woes...)

2005-10-16 Thread Bill Schoolcraft

At Mon, 17 Oct 2005 it looks like Andrew P. composed:

humbly_snipped



It's not a problem with FreeBSD, really. The ports
themselves should get to work under amd64.


Ahh, very good point.  I didn't look at it from that angle.


2006 will probably become the year of widespread
adoption of 64-bit computing. Until it ends, you'd
better use FreeBSD/i386 on your desktops. All
server software that was popular enough was
ensured to run on FreeBSD/amd64 smoothly.


Yes, the flash plugin had me sigh also...  From being used to
using Unix based OS's for a while, I've come to not expect
flash to work on anything, sad as it may seem.  I guess it's
like the unix-fonts in our browsers, you kinda get numb to the
whole thing.

Thanks for the replies.

--
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076
San Francisco, CA 94121
http://billschoolcraft.com
 ~
You do best what you like most.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: .wma music files (amd64 woes...)

2005-10-16 Thread Mark Kane

Andrew P. wrote:

On 10/17/05, Bill Schoolcraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:



Bill Schoolcraft wrote:


At Sun, 16 Oct 2005 it looks like Mark Kane composed:



Bill Schoolcraft wrote:



Gr, is there a list of all the ports that don't work on
AMD64 machines?  I just attempted to install the above :(



http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/

I checked there for the xmms-wma port although I did not find it. Post the
errors that occurred and someone may be able to help.

-Mark



Thanks Mark,

Here is all that happened:

#

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/audio/xmms-wma]- make install

===  xmms-wma-1.0.4_2 is only for i386, and you are running amd64.

#



Oh okay. See what Andrew said then (that it's only for i386). I guess it
won't work, sorry :(


Do you see all/any of this getting resolved with the release of 6.0 ?

This of course is not the first port that has this limitation.
I was really stoked to get my first amd64 with 1-gig of ram, I
had no idea that these bumps would occur.  I run 5.4 on i386 and
it was that experience that led me to get the 64bit box.

I have it triple booted with FreeBSD-5.4/WinXP-Pro/SuSE-9.3
but keep it booted into BSD to keep the faith!

--
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076
San Francisco, CA 94121
http://billschoolcraft.com
 ~
You do best what you like most.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





It's not a problem with FreeBSD, really. The ports
themselves should get to work under amd64.

2006 will probably become the year of widespread
adoption of 64-bit computing. Until it ends, you'd
better use FreeBSD/i386 on your desktops. All
server software that was popular enough was
ensured to run on FreeBSD/amd64 smoothly.

The situation is not much better with Linux, and
even worse with Windows.


I run the amd64 version of FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE on my main workstation 
and there is really only one thing that I would like to run that I 
can't. As much as I dislike flash, lots of websites I visit (including 
one of my own) are in flash so I do wish I could view them.


Actually, I guess one more thing would be OpenOffice since the current 
version of AbiWord in ports has some known bad crashing issues with the 
amd64 version of FreeBSD.


-Mark

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: .wma music files (amd64 woes...)

2005-10-16 Thread Andrew P.
On 10/17/05, Bill Schoolcraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At Mon, 17 Oct 2005 it looks like Andrew P. composed:

 humbly_snipped

 
  It's not a problem with FreeBSD, really. The ports
  themselves should get to work under amd64.

 Ahh, very good point.  I didn't look at it from that angle.

  2006 will probably become the year of widespread
  adoption of 64-bit computing. Until it ends, you'd
  better use FreeBSD/i386 on your desktops. All
  server software that was popular enough was
  ensured to run on FreeBSD/amd64 smoothly.

 Yes, the flash plugin had me sigh also...  From being used to
 using Unix based OS's for a while, I've come to not expect
 flash to work on anything, sad as it may seem.  I guess it's
 like the unix-fonts in our browsers, you kinda get numb to the
 whole thing.

 Thanks for the replies.

 --
 Bill Schoolcraft
 PO Box 210076
 San Francisco, CA 94121
 http://billschoolcraft.com
   ~
 You do best what you like most.

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Only through everyday work with FreeBSD did I
understand the whole scam with claims that
technologies like Java and Flash are cross-
platform. While a thing remains proprietary, it
won't be open and free, however hard one tries
to advertise it.

Try to convince me to develop in ActionScrip
or Java now, I'll just tell you Thanks, but no,
thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD64 Woes

2004-07-28 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Remi wrote:
I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz
on 5.2.1-R
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU)
I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all?
First, you could start by not cross-posting to three different mailing 
lists. Then, change the power-saving settings that you have in the 
system's bios. Laptops do not always run at their rated clock speed. Doing 
so would have a significant negative impact on the system's battery life. 
As such, plugging in your laptop before the system posts, will likely 
yield a Mhz guestimate much closer to what you were expecting.

Regards,
Andy
| Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant 
| Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD64 Woes

2004-07-28 Thread Phil Brennan
Just force the cpu speed to high in your bios setup.

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:46:22 -0700, Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz
 on 5.2.1-R
 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU)
 
 I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all?
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: AMD64 Woes

2004-07-28 Thread Remi
That's exactly the problem. The BIOS won't let me. And the AC line is
plugged in. Windows XP Pro detects it correctly, there's something something
else going on with BSD.

-Original Message-
From: Phil Brennan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:33 AM
To: Remi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 Woes

Just force the cpu speed to high in your bios setup.

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:46:22 -0700, Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at
800MHz
 on 5.2.1-R
 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU)
 
 I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all?
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


AMD64 Woes

2004-07-27 Thread Remi
I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz
on 5.2.1-R
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU)

I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all?


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]