Re: Are 4 IPFW rules enough?

2004-07-24 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Kevin Curran wrote: I have a cable modem and I'm using 4.9 as a NAT router for my home network. I have 4 rules in my ipfw config. The first enables NAT and the last is 65000 allow any to any. In between I ha 2 rules to deny access to ports 53 and 110 on the Internet side. That's all. Here's m

RE: Are 4 IPFW rules enough?

2004-06-16 Thread fbsd_user
learn about all your FBSD firewall options -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Curran Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Are 4 IPFW rules enough? I have a cable modem and I'm using 4.9 as a NAT router f

Re: Are 4 IPFW rules enough?

2004-06-16 Thread Bill Moran
Kevin Curran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a cable modem and I'm using 4.9 as a NAT router for my home > network. I have 4 rules in my ipfw config. The first enables NAT and > the last is 65000 allow any to any. > > In between I ha 2 rules to deny access to ports 53 and 110 on the > Inter

Are 4 IPFW rules enough?

2004-06-16 Thread Kevin Curran
I have a cable modem and I'm using 4.9 as a NAT router for my home network. I have 4 rules in my ipfw config. The first enables NAT and the last is 65000 allow any to any. In between I ha 2 rules to deny access to ports 53 and 110 on the Internet side. That's all. Here's my thinking: I use i