Re: CVS (freebsd /src) confusion
Were it gets even more confusing is files like freebsd.submit.cf where there are multiple version numbers. The version in my temproot is $FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.submit.mc,v 1.1.12.2 2006/08/23 $Id: proto.m4,v 8.719 2006/03/30 20:50:13 And on my system I have: $FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.submit.mc,v 1.1.16.1 2006/04/13 $Id: proto.m4,v 8.718 2005/08/24 18:07:23 Now each file is newer and older then the other :) Basically I just want to make sure i'm merging in the right direction. I don't want to accidentally break something. N.J. Mann wrote: > On Monday, 5 February, 2007 at 12:17:18 -0500, Dan Casey wrote: > >> Using cvsup I am upgrading my boxes from RELENG_6_1, to RELENG_6_2. >> >> I've been noticing something strange, and I'm wondering if I'm thinking >> too much into it. >> >> I've modified mergemaster so that instead of using diff, it would just >> append to a text the files that need to be diffed. This way i can do it >> with vimdiff instead. >> >> >> I would think that the RELENG_6_2 would have more recent files then >> 6_1. Here are a few examples. >> I'm looking at cvsweb, which seems to confirm that that the versions of >> these files are correct. >> >> >> /etc/defaults/devfs.rules >> version in 6.1 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/devfs.rules,v 1.3.12.1 >> 2006/04/26 18:39:17 >> version in 6.2 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/devfs.rules,v 1.3.8.1 >> 2006/04/26 18:38:43 >> >> /etc/defaults/periodic.conf >> version in 6.1 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.1 >> 2006/03/08 23:01:18 >> version in 6.2 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.2 >> 2006/09/28 01:59:29 >> > > I just checked in the CVS repository using the web interface at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi > and it appears you have the correct versions of the files. As to why > the devfs.rules is (an apparently) earlier version, I don't know. You > could try browsing the CVS repository if you really want to know. :-) > > > Cheers, >Nick. > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: CVS (freebsd /src) confusion
On Monday, 5 February, 2007 at 12:17:18 -0500, Dan Casey wrote: > Using cvsup I am upgrading my boxes from RELENG_6_1, to RELENG_6_2. > > I've been noticing something strange, and I'm wondering if I'm thinking > too much into it. > > I've modified mergemaster so that instead of using diff, it would just > append to a text the files that need to be diffed. This way i can do it > with vimdiff instead. > > > I would think that the RELENG_6_2 would have more recent files then > 6_1. Here are a few examples. > I'm looking at cvsweb, which seems to confirm that that the versions of > these files are correct. > > > /etc/defaults/devfs.rules > version in 6.1 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/devfs.rules,v 1.3.12.1 > 2006/04/26 18:39:17 > version in 6.2 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/devfs.rules,v 1.3.8.1 > 2006/04/26 18:38:43 > > /etc/defaults/periodic.conf > version in 6.1 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.1 > 2006/03/08 23:01:18 > version in 6.2 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.2 > 2006/09/28 01:59:29 I just checked in the CVS repository using the web interface at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi and it appears you have the correct versions of the files. As to why the devfs.rules is (an apparently) earlier version, I don't know. You could try browsing the CVS repository if you really want to know. :-) Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not CC me on replies, I read the list and don't need the dupes. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
CVS (freebsd /src) confusion
Using cvsup I am upgrading my boxes from RELENG_6_1, to RELENG_6_2. I've been noticing something strange, and I'm wondering if I'm thinking too much into it. I've modified mergemaster so that instead of using diff, it would just append to a text the files that need to be diffed. This way i can do it with vimdiff instead. I would think that the RELENG_6_2 would have more recent files then 6_1. Here are a few examples. I'm looking at cvsweb, which seems to confirm that that the versions of these files are correct. /etc/defaults/devfs.rules version in 6.1 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/devfs.rules,v 1.3.12.1 2006/04/26 18:39:17 version in 6.2 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/devfs.rules,v 1.3.8.1 2006/04/26 18:38:43 /etc/defaults/periodic.conf version in 6.1 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.1 2006/03/08 23:01:18 version in 6.2 - $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.2 2006/09/28 01:59:29 Did freebsd tag older versions a some files, or am I going nuts? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
