On Jun 18, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
On Thu 18 Jun 2009 at 14:18:21 PDT Tim Judd wrote:
I've read reports (and forgotten it's source since then) that some
Intel Atom processors work well, some don't with FreeBSD. This was
something I read within a couple months, so I would see
John Almberg writes:
I have a client who has an application that he wants to deploy in his
customer's offices as a headless 'appliance'. Basically, just a black
box that you can plug into a Lan, turn it on, and it runs. No floppy
disk or CD, no monitor/keyboard, just remotely
On Fri 19 Jun 2009 at 07:24:58 PDT John Almberg wrote:
Sounds good. They are so inexpensive, I will just give it a whirl and
see if it cuts the mustard. Speed isn't really an issue, since it's
going to be twiddling it's thumbs most of the time. Doesn't really
matter if it takes 10 seconds
I have a couple of Via Artigo a2000 boxes, one running FreeBSD-STABLE
(post 7.2) and the other running FreeNAS. Both work well. I've seen
posts from one fellow who's tracking a bug with the vge interface
under very heavy load, but both of mine stream music and do Time
Machine backups via
I have a client who has an application that he wants to deploy in his
customer's offices as a headless 'appliance'. Basically, just a black
box that you can plug into a Lan, turn it on, and it runs. No floppy
disk or CD, no monitor/keyboard, just remotely managed.
This application won't
What kind of application? This is so we can gear a hardware that is
powerful enough to power your application.
Naming the application and/or website would be a good addition.
On 6/18/09, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
I have a client who has an application that he wants to deploy in
On 6/18/09, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
I have a client who has an application that he wants to deploy in his
customer's offices as a headless 'appliance'. Basically, just a black
box that you can plug into a Lan, turn it on, and it runs. No floppy
disk or CD, no
On 6/18/09, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
What kind of application? This is so we can gear a hardware that is
powerful enough to power your application.
Naming the application and/or website would be a good addition.
It's main
Tim Judd wrote:
On 6/18/09, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
What kind of application? This is so we can gear a hardware that is
powerful enough to power your application.
Naming the application and/or website would be a good
There was a discussion on this a few days ago. I happen to have one of
these Atom based systems, a Shuttle X27D:
CPU: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz (1596.01-MHz 686-class
CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x106c2 Stepping = 2
--- On Thu, 6/18/09, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
From: John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com
Subject: Re: Compact Freebsd 'appliance'
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 10:54 PM
There was a discussion on this a
few days ago. I happen to have one
On Thu 18 Jun 2009 at 14:18:21 PDT Tim Judd wrote:
I've read reports (and forgotten it's source since then) that some
Intel Atom processors work well, some don't with FreeBSD. This was
something I read within a couple months, so I would see if anyone here
can provide input on pros and cons on
12 matches
Mail list logo
