Re: Dependencies. (was: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: Remote Code Execution...)

2007-12-19 Thread Modulok
For you to ask that question shows without a doubt that it has been too long since you have sat back, put on Pink Floyd, taken a few bong hits, and contemplated the Universe. Touché. -Modulok- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

RE: Dependencies. (was: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: Remote Code Execution...)

2007-12-17 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Modulok Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 3:35 AM To: Tino Engel Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Dependencies. (was: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2,1 is forbidden: Remote Code Execution...)

Re: Dependencies. (was: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: Remote Code Execution...)

2007-12-17 Thread Heiko Wundram (Beenic)
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 11:29:01 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: For you to ask that question shows without a doubt that it has been too long since you have sat back, put on Pink Floyd, taken a few bong hits, and contemplated the Universe. Thanks for cheering up my workday! ;-) -- Heiko

Dependencies. (was: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: Remote Code Execution...)

2007-12-16 Thread Modulok
snip Code re-use is a good thing. Intricate, far-reaching dependencies are not. While package managers attempt to mitigate the underlying issue, using code re-use as an excuse for the fragility of a system design, is unfortunate. I do not pretend to have all of the answers, but I feel that