Re: Foo***-lite ?

2007-02-18 Thread Gary Kline
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:36:39AM +1100, Nick Withers wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:57:30 -0800
> Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > People,
> > 
> > I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give
> > me a few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window managers.  So
> > far I have the regular gnome2 and KDE3 desktops going on my test box
> > quite well.  kde at least gives users the opportunity to
> > set the level of eye-candy from low to high.  I have not seen
> > anything equivalent for gnome.
> 
> As far as I know, GNOME doesn't really have "eye candy" the same way
> KDE does (there are no fading menus, bouncy transparent cursors,
> etc.).

You may well be rght since I've only seen the set-option on KDE.

> 
> > How do I test gnome2-lite and kde-lite? I've found startkde, but
> > no startkdelite.  I've found the gnome-session binary, but no
> > gnomelite-session.
> > 
> > If I need kde|gnome2- lite.desktop files, please clue me in.
> > Otherwise,  how do I instiantiate these lite flavor
> > desktops?
> 
> I think you've misunderstood what the -lite versions are. From
> ports/x11/gnome2-lite/pkg-descr:
> 
> 
> This metaport installs the pieces of the GNOME 2 desktop that
> are needed to provide a functional desktop.  x11/gnome2
> contains the full version of the GNOME 2 desktop environment.
> 
> 
> In other words, it's the same GNOME, but installing the gnome2-lite
> port doesn't install "extras", like games. GNOME is invoked the same
> way regardless of which port is used.
> 
> I believe that the kde-lite port is the same.
> 

I see (*now* :-).  Well, since I'm not much of a gamer, it's
not a problem.  I did see that gnome-light installed only part
of the suite.  That should've been a clue.  I was expecting some 
kernel/apps wizard to tune things so that, say, the calender
would be niced down to a lower prio and the xterm/terminal/
and-or vi and broswers would have been set to a higher priority.

That is my next task, hopefully without getting too deeply into 
the C/++ code.   I've test added things like xload and xclock
and will see if the session managers are savvy enough to accept
a "nice -17 /usr/bin/program" line in there.  gnome2 at least has
a run priority from 0 to 50 or the like.  That may be worth
looking at.

tx for your insights,

gary

> -- 
> Nick Withers
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web: http://www.nickwithers.com
> Mobile: +61 414 397 446

-- 
  Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Foo***-lite ?

2007-02-18 Thread Nick Withers
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:57:30 -0800
Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
>   People,
> 
>   I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give
> me a few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window managers.  So
> far I have the regular gnome2 and KDE3 desktops going on my test box
>   quite well.  kde at least gives users the opportunity to
> set the level of eye-candy from low to high.  I have not seen
> anything equivalent for gnome.

As far as I know, GNOME doesn't really have "eye candy" the same way
KDE does (there are no fading menus, bouncy transparent cursors,
etc.).

> How do I test gnome2-lite and kde-lite? I've found startkde, but
> no startkdelite.  I've found the gnome-session binary, but no
> gnomelite-session.
> 
>   If I need kde|gnome2- lite.desktop files, please clue me in.
>   Otherwise,  how do I instiantiate these lite flavor
> desktops?

I think you've misunderstood what the -lite versions are. From
ports/x11/gnome2-lite/pkg-descr:


This metaport installs the pieces of the GNOME 2 desktop that
are needed to provide a functional desktop.  x11/gnome2
contains the full version of the GNOME 2 desktop environment.


In other words, it's the same GNOME, but installing the gnome2-lite
port doesn't install "extras", like games. GNOME is invoked the same
way regardless of which port is used.

I believe that the kde-lite port is the same.

>   thanks much,
> 
>   gary
> 
> 
> -- 
>   Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service
> Unix
-- 
Nick Withers
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.nickwithers.com
Mobile: +61 414 397 446
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Foo***-lite ?

2007-02-18 Thread Gary Kline

People,

I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give me a
few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window managers.  So far
I have the regular gnome2 and KDE3 desktops going on my test box
quite well.  kde at least gives users the opportunity to set the
level of eye-candy from low to high.  I have not seen anything
equivalent for gnome.  How do I test gnome2-lite and kde-lite?
I've found startkde, but no startkdelite.  I've found the
gnome-session binary, but no gnomelite-session.

If I need kde|gnome2- lite.desktop files, please clue me in.
Otherwise,  how do I instiantiate these lite flavor desktops?

thanks much,

gary


-- 
  Gary Kline  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org  Public Service Unix

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"