-Original Message-
From: Peter Schuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:02 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Chris; Adrian Chadd
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
The people complaining about hardware
The people complaining about hardware compatibility need
to pull their heads out. If they are buying brand new systems
they are utter fools if they don't check out in advance
what works and what doesen't. It's not like there's a
shortage of experienced people on this list who could
tell
-Original Message-
From: Simon Dircks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 8:27 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Peter Losher; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Simon Dircks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 8:27 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Peter Losher; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message-
From: Peter Losher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 10:18 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Yeah, ISC just hates FreeBSD... rolls eyes
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Losher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 10:18 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Yeah, ISC just hates FreeBSD
* I am trying to understand what is different about the ISC
configuration but have not yet found the cause.
It's called Anti-FreeBSD bias. You won't find anything.
If this is true, please try to explain to me the following:
- ISC hosts 5 Netra 1s that comprise most of our sparc64 package
On 29/02/2008, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Device drivers and hardware are a cooperative effort. The ideal
is a well-written device driver and well-designed hardware.
Unfortunately the reality of it appears to be that it costs
a LOT more money to hire good silicon designers
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
My beef with the DNS tests was that ISC ran out and bought
the hardware FIRST, -then- they started testing. This is
directly contrary to every bit of advice ever given in
the computer industry for the last 50 years - you select
the software FIRST, -then- you buy the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 6:21 PM
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
On 01/03/2008, Adrian Chadd
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Chris wrote:
Ironically the latest server I got last night has a intel pro 1000 a rarity
:)
I am just giving feedback as when I speak to people in the datacentre and
hosting business the biggest gripe with freebsd is hardware compatability,
as I adore freebsd I ignore
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 02:20:58AM +, Chris wrote:
On 01/03/2008, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/03/2008, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well
as it does in other operating systems just because its
]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Oliver Herold wrote:
Hi,
I saw this bind benchmarks just some minutes ago,
http://new.isc.org/proj/dnsperf/OStest.html
is this true for FreeBSD 7 (current state: RELENG_7/7.0R) too? Or is
this something
-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions
At 10:44 AM 2/29/2008, Chris wrote:
A weakness of freebsd is its fussyness over hardware in particular
network cards, time and time again I see posts here telling people to
go out buying expensive intel pro 1000 cards just so they can use the
operating system properly when I think its
On 29/02/2008, Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 15:44 +, Chris wrote:
On 29/02/2008, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A weakness of freebsd is its fussyness over hardware in particular
network cards, time and time again I see posts here telling people
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 7:45 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Sam Leffler; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Oliver Herold; Kris
Kennaway; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
A weakness
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 15:44 +, Chris wrote:
On 29/02/2008, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A weakness of freebsd is its fussyness over hardware in particular
network cards, time and time again I see posts here telling people to
go out buying expensive intel pro 1000 cards just
On Feb 29, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Chris wrote:
A weakness of freebsd is its fussyness over hardware in particular
network cards, time and time again I see posts here telling people to
go out buying expensive intel pro 1000 cards just so they can use the
operating system properly when I think its
On 01/03/2008, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well
as it does in other operating systems just because its cheaper its not
an excuse for buggy performance. There is also other good network
cards apart from intel pro 1000. I
On 01/03/2008, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/03/2008, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well
as it does in other operating systems just because its cheaper its not
an excuse for buggy performance. There is also
Adrian Chadd wrote:
(Sorry for top posting.)
Its not actually -that- bad an idea to compare different applications.
It sets the bar for how far the entire system {hardware, OS,
application, network} can be pushed.
If nsd beats bind9 by say 5 or 10% over all, then its nothing to write
home
in FreeBSD 7
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 2:57 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
* I am trying
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Oliver
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Oliver
] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Oliver Herold wrote:
Hi,
I saw this bind benchmarks just some minutes ago
Kris Kennaway wrote:
[SCHNIPP]
* 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with workloads
involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0.
will this patch also be available for 7.0?
Regards,
Oliver
___
O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
[SCHNIPP]
* 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with
workloads involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0.
will this patch also be available for 7.0?
If you mean will it be merged to RELENG_7, absolutely. If you mean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Oliver Herold wrote:
Hi
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Oliver
Hi,
I saw this bind benchmarks just some minutes ago,
http://new.isc.org/proj/dnsperf/OStest.html
is this true for FreeBSD 7 (current state: RELENG_7/7.0R) too? Or is
this something verified only for the state of development back in August
2007?
--Oliver
--
QOTD:
Ludwig Boltzmann, who
Oliver Herold wrote:
Hi,
I saw this bind benchmarks just some minutes ago,
http://new.isc.org/proj/dnsperf/OStest.html
is this true for FreeBSD 7 (current state: RELENG_7/7.0R) too? Or is
this something verified only for the state of development back in August
2007?
I have been trying to
* 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with workloads
involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0.
Kris can you say anything more about interrupt workload bugs on ULE?
On all my 7.0 servers I now am using ULE even on the UP ones as it was
said there is slight
Chris wrote:
* 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with workloads
involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0.
Kris can you say anything more about interrupt workload bugs on ULE?
On all my 7.0 servers I now am using ULE even on the UP ones as it was
said there is
35 matches
Mail list logo
