[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear FreeBSD users,
I urgenly need to connect 192.168.1.* network to the internet. What am I
doing wrong?
I have 2 networks, 192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.*
FreeBSD 5.1 is connected to both networks via 2 network cards, its ip is
192.168.0.3 and 192.168.1.2.
As of now from t
Yes I realize about the 10.0... and 192.168 not being routed matter.
Previosly I always setup the network but never run out of IP address in
the same range(192.168.0.*). It happened this time. Therefore I created
the 192.168.1.* network but now it wont route. I can use NAT for that
purpose but
> You forgot natd.
>
> Am guessing your DSL or cable modem is doing NAT and assigning an
> address to your FreeBSD system.
No the modem assigns IP to the 192.168.0.1 router, which in turn acts as
gateway for the rest of the network. I only have 1 real IP address. It
seems I have NAT already on the
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 08:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD users,
>
> I urgenly need to connect 192.168.1.* network to the internet. What
> am I doing wrong?
[...]
You forgot natd.
Am guessing your DSL or cable modem is doing NAT and assigning an
address to your FreeBSD sys
On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 21:33:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD users,
>
> I urgenly need to connect 192.168.1.* network to the internet. What
> am I doing wrong?
You're assuming it's possible. It's not. Addresses in the range
192.168.x.x are explicitly not routed. See
Dear FreeBSD users,
I urgenly need to connect 192.168.1.* network to the internet. What am I
doing wrong?
I have 2 networks, 192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.*
FreeBSD 5.1 is connected to both networks via 2 network cards, its ip is
192.168.0.3 and 192.168.1.2.
As of now from the 192.168.1 network I ca
