Gary Kline wrote:
SOAPBOX
Anyway, this is to the entire list: A week or so ago
I loaned my 5.3 set to a non-geek friend who had occasionally
been using RH. He brought the box of discs back and said it
was too hard to install; that RH had a much easier
Pete Slagle wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
SOAPBOX
Anyway, this is to the entire list: A week or so ago
I loaned my 5.3 set to a non-geek friend who had occasionally
been using RH. He brought the box of discs back and said it
was too hard to install; that
Alex Zbyslaw writes:
Pete Slagle wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
SOAPBOX
Anyway, this is to the entire list: A week or so ago
I loaned my 5.3 set to a non-geek friend who had occasionally
been using RH. He brought the box of discs back and said it
was too
From: Pete Slagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary Kline wrote:
SOAPBOX
Anyway, this is to the entire list: A week or so ago
I loaned my 5.3 set to a non-geek friend who had occasionally
been using RH. He brought the box of discs back and said it
was too hard to install; that RH had a much easier
Anybody know why getty is having such a bear of a time finding
a tty? I Can't even get in. I'm at 6.1 and logged in
single-usr and have /usr mounted on /dev. Because X expects
to find /usr/lib/Y in /usr I csn't use anything very complex;
can't poke
Gary Kline wrote:
Anybody know why getty is having such a bear of a time finding
a tty? I Can't even get in. I'm at 6.1 and logged in
single-usr and have /usr mounted on /dev. Because X expects
to find /usr/lib/Y in /usr I csn't use anything very complex;
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:48:04PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
Anybody know why getty is having such a bear of a time finding
a tty? I Can't even get in. I'm at 6.1 and logged in
single-usr and have /usr mounted on /dev. Because X expects
to find
