Re: IPFW: Is keep/check-state inherent?

2008-08-30 Thread Michael Powell
Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi everyone, I can't recall for certain, but not so long ago, I either read or heard about IPFW having implicit keep-state and check-state. Is it true that I can now omit these keywords in my rulesets? Haven't used IPFW in years so I do not know about IPFW.

IPFW: Is keep/check-state inherent?

2008-08-29 Thread Steve Bertrand
Hi everyone, I can't recall for certain, but not so long ago, I either read or heard about IPFW having implicit keep-state and check-state. Is it true that I can now omit these keywords in my rulesets? Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

Re: IPFW: Is keep/check-state inherent?

2008-08-29 Thread Christopher Cowart
Steve Bertrand wrote: I can't recall for certain, but not so long ago, I either read or heard about IPFW having implicit keep-state and check-state. Is it true that I can now omit these keywords in my rulesets? keep-state is not implicit. check-state is not generally necessary, because