need
> to be documented in the man IPFW data.
>
> Should this be submitted as an problem report?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Pelleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- fbsd_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FBSD 5.2 man IPFW does not say anything
> different that the 4.9
> man IPFW.
> Are you saying the man doc in 5.2 is wrong?
>
> 5.2 is using the ipfw2 code for IPFIREWALL I
> believe.
>
> Documenting the fact that 'limit' performs the same
> function
age-
From: Dan Pelleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: IPFW 'keep state' & 'limit'
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Reading the man page on IPF
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Reading the man page on IPFW rule syntax, I get the impression that
> the 'limit' option uses the stateful dynamic rules table. But it's
> unclear whether 'keep state' and limit can be used on the same rule,
> or if the limit option performs the 'keep stat
Reading the man page on IPFW rule syntax, I get the impression that
the 'limit' option uses the stateful dynamic rules table. But it's
unclear whether 'keep state' and limit can be used on the same rule,
or if the limit option performs the 'keep state' function in
addition to the limit function.
S
