Re: Is ALTQ part of 6.0 base system
On Thursday 30 March 2006 16:42, fbsd_user wrote: > >> Can ALTQ support be compiled into a custom kernel and be > >> used stand-a-lone? >> >> They can be used in anything which is compiled to use them, yes. > > Then if what you say is true, there would be man pages in the > base system for using ALTQ stand-a-lone and there are none. Using ALTQ with ipfw is covered in ipfw(8) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Is ALTQ part of 6.0 base system
Then if what you say is true, there would be man pages in the base system for using ALTQ stand-a-lone and there are none. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: Re: Is ALTQ part of 6.0 base system > Can ALTQ support be compiled into a custom kernel and be > used stand-a-lone? They can be used in anything which is compiled to use them, yes. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Is ALTQ part of 6.0 base system
> Can ALTQ support be compiled into a custom kernel and be > used stand-a-lone? They can be used in anything which is compiled to use them, yes. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Is ALTQ part of 6.0 base system
Reading the pf firewall man pages says to use ALTQ with PF a custom kernel has to be complied with the ALTQ options included. This seems to indicate that ALTQ is only available when used with the pf firewall. ALTQ used to be available as a port so it could be used stand-a-lone. Can ALTQ support be compiled into a custom kernel and be used stand-a-lone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: Re: Is ALTQ part of 6.0 base system On 3/29/06, fbsd_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Back in 5.2 development when OpenBSD pf was being included > in the base system there was talk that ALTQ for bandwidth > management was also being worked on to become part of > the base system. > > What is the status of ALTQ is it a port or in the base system now? Kernel. grep ALTQ /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES man 9 altq -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Is ALTQ part of 6.0 base system
On 3/29/06, fbsd_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Back in 5.2 development when OpenBSD pf was being included > in the base system there was talk that ALTQ for bandwidth > management was also being worked on to become part of > the base system. > > What is the status of ALTQ is it a port or in the base system now? Kernel. grep ALTQ /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES man 9 altq -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Is ALTQ part of 6.0 base system
Back in 5.2 development when OpenBSD pf was being included in the base system there was talk that ALTQ for bandwidth management was also being worked on to become part of the base system. What is the status of ALTQ is it a port or in the base system now? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"