Re: Jail, pf and ftpd: Connection refused

2008-10-04 Thread Redd Vinylene
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > See ftp-proxy(8). > > Note that active works with the ruleset you provided (due to the "pass out > keep state"-rule), but there is obviously a firewall problem on the client > preventing that. > Nevermind, I think the "Tra

Re: Jail, pf and ftpd: Connection refused

2008-10-04 Thread Redd Vinylene
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > See ftp-proxy(8). > > Note that active works with the ruleset you provided (due to the "pass out > keep state"-rule), but there is obviously a firewall problem on the client > preventing that. > Are you sure I need ftp-proxy

Re: Jail, pf and ftpd: Connection refused

2008-10-03 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 03 October 2008 11:11:57 Redd Vinylene wrote: > Greetings ladies and gentlemen! > > Why does the below pf.conf (run from box1) give me > "getpeername(control_sock): Transport endpoint is not connected, > Socket error (Connection refused) - reconnecting" when trying to log > onto box3 via

Jail, pf and ftpd: Connection refused

2008-10-03 Thread Redd Vinylene
Greetings ladies and gentlemen! Why does the below pf.conf (run from box1) give me "getpeername(control_sock): Transport endpoint is not connected, Socket error (Connection refused) - reconnecting" when trying to log onto box3 via passive FTP? Active FTP gives me "425 Can't build data connection: