emulators ports: linux_base-8 vs linux_base-fc4
hallo after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following: ## linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s): linux_base-8-8.0_15 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). ## and kgb# pkg_info linux_base-8-8.0_15 Information for linux_base-8-8.0_15: Comment: Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (for i386/amd64) Required by: acroread7-7.0.1,1 linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 linux-atk-1.8.0_2 linux-expat-1.95.7_1 linux-firefox-1.5.0.4 linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4 linux-glib2-2.4.8_2 linux-gtk2-2.4.14_4 linux-hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 linux-jpeg-6b.33_1 linux-pango-1.6.0_2 linux-png-1.2.8_1 linux-tiff-3.6.1_6 linux_dri-4.4.0 skype-1.2.0.18 is it ok deleting linux_base-8 and installing linux-base-fc4 ? will the dependencies be satisfied ? thanks, petre -- Petre Bandac Network Scientist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: emulators ports: linux_base-8 vs linux_base-fc4
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:18:57PM +0300, Petre Bandac wrote: hallo after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following: ## linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s): linux_base-8-8.0_15 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). ## [...] is it ok deleting linux_base-8 and installing linux-base-fc4 ? will the dependencies be satisfied ? Read the 20060616 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING for information on how to update the linux emulation stuff. -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: emulators ports: linux_base-8 vs linux_base-fc4
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:18:57 +0300 Petre Bandac wrote: after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following: ## linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s): linux_base-8-8.0_15 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). ## and kgb# pkg_info linux_base-8-8.0_15 Information for linux_base-8-8.0_15: Comment: Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (for i386/amd64) Required by: acroread7-7.0.1,1 linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 linux-atk-1.8.0_2 linux-expat-1.95.7_1 linux-firefox-1.5.0.4 linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4 linux-glib2-2.4.8_2 linux-gtk2-2.4.14_4 linux-hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 linux-jpeg-6b.33_1 linux-pango-1.6.0_2 linux-png-1.2.8_1 linux-tiff-3.6.1_6 linux_dri-4.4.0 skype-1.2.0.18 is it ok deleting linux_base-8 and installing linux-base-fc4 ? will the dependencies be satisfied ? According to /usr/ports/UPDATING (please read it for detailed information) you should replace linux base and linux X libraries. All the dependencies should be satisfied. BTW there were many changes to linux infrostructure ports since your installation. You may consider portupgrading them all. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-8 fetch # of ports errors
Anthony M. Agelastos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello everyone, Several hours ago, I tried to upgrade linux_base-8 on my 6.0-STABLE box and it ran into many fetch problems, which can be seen below. Prior to this upgrading, I upgraded xorg without problems and after the failed troubleshooting, I had the machine install Firefox and it fetched it and built it without problems. Does anyone have any suggestions? I checked the archives and did not find anything. I The servers don't seem to have that RPM, and the ones I checked (from my copy of the port, which doesn't seem to match yours) had, if anything, an older version. I don't know the right place or version; I'm having a little trouble wandering around the various FTP servers... CVSup'd from cvsup13.us if that has anything to do with it. While on the topic, I noticed earlier today that when I first issued the portupgrade command, it rebuilt the package database and it mentioned that there were 13,3xx packages... last time I checked the website it listed over 14,000 and I have my cvsup file set to d/l all groups. Any ideas? Thank you all for your continued assistance. I've got a hair over 14000 entries in the ports db this morning. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux_base-8 fetch # of ports errors
Hello everyone, Several hours ago, I tried to upgrade linux_base-8 on my 6.0-STABLE box and it ran into many fetch problems, which can be seen below. Prior to this upgrading, I upgraded xorg without problems and after the failed troubleshooting, I had the machine install Firefox and it fetched it and built it without problems. Does anyone have any suggestions? I checked the archives and did not find anything. I CVSup'd from cvsup13.us if that has anything to do with it. While on the topic, I noticed earlier today that when I first issued the portupgrade command, it rebuilt the package database and it mentioned that there were 13,3xx packages... last time I checked the website it listed over 14,000 and I have my cvsup file set to d/l all groups. Any ideas? Thank you all for your continued assistance. Script started on Sun Jan 22 23:06:36 2006 dell# portupgrade -arR --- Upgrading 'linux_base-8-8.0_6' to 'linux_base-8-8.0_11' (emulators/linux_base-8) --- Building '/usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8' === Cleaning for rpm-3.0.6_10 === Cleaning for gmake-3.80_2 === Cleaning for automake-1.4.6_2 === Cleaning for autoconf-2.13.000227_5 === Cleaning for libtool-1.3.5_2 === Cleaning for popt-1.7 === Cleaning for gettext-0.14.5 === Cleaning for perl-5.8.7_2 === Cleaning for m4-1.4.4 === Cleaning for libtool-1.5.22_1 === Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2_1 === Cleaning for linux_base-8-8.0_11 = bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/ distfiles/rpm/i386/8.0. = Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/ distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/8.0/os/i386/. fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/ linux/8.0/os/i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found = Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/ distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/8.0/updates/i386/. fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/ linux/8.0/updates/i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found = Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/ distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/. fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/ linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found = Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/ distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/8.0/updates/SRPMS/. fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/ linux/8.0/updates/SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found = Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/ linux/8.0/os/i386/. fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linux/8.0/os/i386/ bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found = Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/ linux/8.0/updates/i386/. fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linux/8.0/updates/ i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found = Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/ linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/. fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/ bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found = Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/ linux/8.0/updates/SRPMS/. fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linux/8.0/updates/ SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found = Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ linux/redhat/8.0/os/i386/. fetch: ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/os/i386/ bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ linux/redhat/8.0/updates/i386/. fetch: ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/updates/ i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ linux/redhat/8.0/os/SRPMS/. fetch: ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/os/SRPMS/ bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ linux/redhat/8.0/updates/SRPMS/. fetch: ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/updates/ SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/ redhat/linux/8.0/os/i386/. fetch: ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/8.0/os/ i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/ redhat/linux/8.0/updates/i386/. fetch: ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/8.0/ updates/i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/ redhat/linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/. fetch: ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/8.0/os/ SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable
Re: Compiling/installing ports via NFS - any gotcha's? (while building linux_base-8-8.0_6, /usr/bin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Operation not supported)
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:15:19PM -0600, John typed: I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree (surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to make install acroread and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server. I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and linprocfs mounted). I have rpc.statd and rpc.lockd running on both systems. What version of FreeBSD are you running? AFAIK, rpc.lockd in 4.x only handles serverside locking, not from the client. Ruben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiling/installing ports via NFS - any gotcha's? (while building linux_base-8-8.0_6, /usr/bin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Operation not supported)
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:19:18PM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:15:19PM -0600, John typed: I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree (surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to make install acroread and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server. I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and linprocfs mounted). I have rpc.statd and rpc.lockd running on both systems. What version of FreeBSD are you running? AFAIK, rpc.lockd in 4.x only handles serverside locking, not from the client. Thanks, Ruben. I should have said. It's 5.3-STABLE on both sides. I now believe the problem was that I installed some parts before the cvsup, and some parts after, and missed the messages about it needing newer versions of some of the parts. I ripped out all the dependent packages and reinstalled the latest versions, and a lot of the weirdness went away. I also gave up trying to do the make over NFS, which I now regret, because my NFS server is the least powerful machine I have in terms of CPU power, and it's been compilig for about 16 hours now... -- John Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compiling/installing ports via NFS - any gotcha's? (while building linux_base-8-8.0_6, /usr/bin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Operation not supported)
I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree (surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to make install acroread and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server. I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and linprocfs mounted). I have rpc.statd and rpc.lockd running on both systems. It keeps erroring out with the message in my Subject line: === Patching for linux_base-8-8.0_6 === linux_base-8-8.0_6 depends on executable: rpm - found === Configuring for linux_base-8-8.0_6 === Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_6 kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 - 3 redhat-release-8.0-8.noarch.rpm glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm /usr/sbin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Operation not supported execution of glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8 script failed, exit status 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8. Any clues for me? -- John Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux_base-8 mystery
Hi, I have a question that has really stumped me. I have searched far and wide and have found no literature on it. My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from packages? I am running linux_base-7.1_7 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE and wish to upgrade to linux_base-8. As root I type pkg_add -r linux_base-8 and get the following Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/linux_base-8.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/linux_base-8.tgz' by URL It installs perfectly from ports, but why not from packages? I am puzzled. Does any one know why or can point me to some reference or literature explaining this mystery? Cheers Bob Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies. http://au.movies.yahoo.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-8 mystery
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 19:32, Bsd B wrote: Hi, I have a question that has really stumped me. I have searched far and wide and have found no literature on it. My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from packages? I am running linux_base-7.1_7 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE and wish to upgrade to linux_base-8. As root I type pkg_add -r linux_base-8 and get the following Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/linux_base-8.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/linux_base-8.tgz' by URL It installs perfectly from ports, but why not from packages? I am puzzled. Does any one know why or can point me to some reference or literature explaining this mystery? I'm VERY new to freebsd, but as i understand things, all packages are ports, but not all ports are packages (unless you build it yourself of course) Cheers Bob Aaron signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: linux_base-8 mystery
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:32:51PM +1100, Bsd B wrote: Hi, I have a question that has really stumped me. I have searched far and wide and have found no literature on it. My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from packages? The maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED] marked it RESTRICTED because he is under the impression that distributing the package would violate the GPL. You're invited to express to trevor your comments about the correctness of this. Kris pgpidRJDoEE1J.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-8 mystery
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 05:32, Bsd B wrote: Hi, I have a question that has really stumped me. I have searched far and wide and have found no literature on it. My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from packages? I am running linux_base-7.1_7 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE and wish to upgrade to linux_base-8. As root I type pkg_add -r linux_base-8 and get the following Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/l inux_base-8.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/ linux_base-8.tgz' by URL There's no linux_base-8 package there. In fact I don't see linux_base-8 packages built for any 4.x (-RELEASE, -STABLE or -CURRENT). It installs perfectly from ports, but why not from packages? I am puzzled. Does any one know why or can point me to some reference or literature explaining this mystery? Packages only exist if someone builds them. The packages in the release directory are, I believe, a shapshot of the ports tree at the time the release was made. I don't know how often the -STABLE and -CURRENT packages are updated or why linux-base-8 isn't in them. I don't see packages for 5.3-RELEASE or -CURRENT either. See the note in section 4.4.1 of the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.html Cheers Bob -- We all enter this world in the same way: naked, screaming, and soaked in blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have to stop there. -- Dana Gould ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux_Base-8 install
Did anyone reply to this person with respect to the below? I've tried e-mailing him directly but am getting a failure in doing so. I have the exact same set up as he and am experiencing the same. Thursday, November 27, 2003, 12:04:43 PM, you wrote: MP I'm running 4.7 Release on one of my systems and am trying to install the MP linux_base-8 from ports. It's failing with the following error: === linux_base-8-8.0_1 depends on executable: rpm - found MP kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 - 3 MP glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.6.i386.rpm MP /usr/sbin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Invalid argument MP execution of glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.6 script failed, exit status 1 MP *** Error code 1 MP Has anyone run into this before? MP -- MP Micheal Patterson MP Network Administration MP Cancer Care Network MP 405-917-0600 MP ___ MP [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list MP http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions MP To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Phillipmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux_Base-8 install
I'm running 4.7 Release on one of my systems and am trying to install the linux_base-8 from ports. It's failing with the following error: === linux_base-8-8.0_1 depends on executable: rpm - found kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 - 3 glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.6.i386.rpm /usr/sbin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Invalid argument execution of glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.6 script failed, exit status 1 *** Error code 1 Has anyone run into this before? -- Micheal Patterson Network Administration Cancer Care Network 405-917-0600 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux_Base 8
I'm running FBSD4.9 release and I'd like to use linux_base 8 instead of 7 but when you install a port that requires the linux emulator it automatically installs linux_base 7 what do I need to do to change this to linux_base 8? Thanks __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux_Base 8
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:42:59AM -0800, E. J. Cerejo wrote: I'm running FBSD4.9 release and I'd like to use linux_base 8 instead of 7 but when you install a port that requires the linux emulator it automatically installs linux_base 7 what do I need to do to change this to linux_base 8? Generally all you need to do is delete the linux_base 7 stuff and install linux_base 8 before you attempt to install anything that would depend on the linux_base port. Ports don't fulfil their dependencies by checking that a particular other port has been installed. Rather they check for the presence of a particular file (often a shared library). Only if that file isn't found then they will attempt to install a port that provides what is required. However, in many cases there are several ports that could fulfil the dependency, and if one of those is already installed things should just work with that. If you're a portupgrade(1) user, you should run pkgdb(1) to fix up the dependencies recorded for the installed packages. That's just bookkeeping, and doesn't affect the day to day operation of the system, although it does make it simpler to upgrade ports later on. Also look at the ALT_PKGDEP array in pkgtools.conf as a way of automatically recording the modified dependency in newly installed ports. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
