On Thursday 31 August 2006 22:12, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Move this line down and place it after mounting of /usr.
Thanks.
That was actually one of the first things I tried, I guess I must have
screwed-up something else at the time.
___
freebsd-quest
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:31:33 +0100 RW wrote:
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 16:26, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
> > > On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> > > but it's complaining th
On Thursday 31 August 2006 16:26, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> > but it's complaining that /compat/linux
>
> Who? Can you provide us with some
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> > Can't confirm that the problem exists:
> > $ uname -a
> > FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
> > 23:26:59 MS
>
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
>
> > Can't confirm that the problem exists:
> > $ uname -a
> > FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
> > 23:26:59 MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/us
On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> Can't confirm that the problem exists:
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
> 23:26:59 MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SRV i3
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > I tried it and it didn't work. Irrespective of whether it should begin
> > linproc
> > or linprocfs, /compat is a link to /usr/compat, and /usr isn't mounted at
> > that point. Do you have a different arrangement?
Would it be possible to submit the output of 'dme
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 August 2006 21:55, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > RW wrote:
> > > What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
> > >
> > > I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
> > >
> > > linproc/compat
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 21:55, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
> >
> > I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
> >
> > linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
> >
> > But in a st
RW wrote:
> What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
>
> I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
>
> linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
>
> But in a standard installation, this mount-point is really under /usr, which
>
What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
But in a standard installation, this mount-point is really under /usr, which
isn't mounted until pass 2.
11 matches
Mail list logo