I always do it, of course. I meant that eliminating /rescue is ** one *** of
the actions I take to spare juicy hd room.
Ciao
Vittoiro
Alle 18:38, martedì 23 maggio 2006, Pietro Cerutti ha scritto:
> On 5/23/06, vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know but:
> >
> > 1) I need more room on the
Alle 18:38, martedì 23 maggio 2006, Pietro Cerutti ha scritto:
l> On 5/23/06, vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know but:
> >
> > 1) I need more room on the hd of my dual boot laptop.
>
> You ain't gaining much space by removing /rescue. It takes 6.9M on my
> 6.1-STABLE.
> You may want to c
On 5/23/06, vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know but:
1) I need more room on the hd of my dual boot laptop.
You ain't gaining much space by removing /rescue. It takes 6.9M on my
6.1-STABLE.
You may want to consider removing /usr/src and /usr/obj which take
respectively 442M and 2G instea
I know but:
1) I need more room on the hd of my dual boot laptop.
2) I invariably "dump" FBSD slices & partitions after a successful upgrade on
a separate usb mass storage.
3) from time to time I back up my /home dir on my office lan fileserver (or on
the same usb hd).
Anyway, I'll give RESCUE
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:18:59PM +0100, Vittorio wrote:
> To update the system in my /etc/make.conf among other building(-world)
> options I put
> a:
>
> NO_RESCUE= true
>
> Which actually is not declared
> neither in the man page of make.conf nor in the
> /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf
To update the system in my /etc/make.conf among other building(-world)
options I put
a:
NO_RESCUE= true
Which actually is not declared
neither in the man page of make.conf nor in the
/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf file.
Nonetheless it seems to work.
Am I right?
Vittorio
_
