OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
I have a server that is a full tower case and want to co-locate it and
all the providers list pricing in rackmount units so what value of x
in xU should I get?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:48:30PM +0100, Peter Boosten wrote:
 
 
 On 4 jan 2009, at 14:35, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com 
  
  Small related question is there any long term harm to laying a disk  
  on
  it's side (i.e. it lays flat when the tower is up right but on it's  
  side
  squeezed into a rack)
 
 
  The ideal answer is 'no'.  The 'safe' answer is 'possibly'.  In other
  words, I wouldn't do it personally, but I don't expect it to cause
  harm.  I'd suspect it'd be more succeptible to a head crash in a
  vertical position.
 
 
 
 Most drives in an drive array are on their side, seems not to be any  
 problem.

And if you ask the various harddisk manufacturers they will say It will
work fine. No problem. when asked if it matters if a disk is mounted
horisontally or vertically or upside down.



-- 
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 08:30:50AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman
 aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
  I have a server that is a full tower case and want to co-locate it and
  all the providers list pricing in rackmount units so what value of x
  in xU should I get?
 
 When it comes to rackmounts, 1U = 1.75 inches.  2U would be 3.5
 inches, etc.  I'll let you do the measuring and math. ;)

It might be worth noting that 1U corresponds exactly to the height of
a typical bay for 5.25 units.


A normal tower case when lain on the side normally has a height
of approximately 4U.  Note though that most tower cases are not designed
to be rackmounted and will not fit in typical rack.
There are some cases available though that can be used both as
floor-standing towers, or as rack-mounted cases.

I suspect that many co-location services either only accepts rack-mountable
servers, or charge extra for non-rackmounted cases, so it might be worth
checking that.




-- 
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Jon Radel
Erik Trulsson wrote:

 I suspect that many co-location services either only accepts rack-mountable
 servers, or charge extra for non-rackmounted cases, so it might be worth
 checking that.

A non-rackmountable case would require a shelf of some sort, which costs
money and generally uses up a bit more space in the rack.  I suggest you
discuss this all with your vendor; they're the only people who know what
they're willing to do and how much they'll charge for it.

--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
Jon Radel wrote:
 Erik Trulsson wrote:

   
 I suspect that many co-location services either only accepts rack-mountable
 servers, or charge extra for non-rackmounted cases, so it might be worth
 checking that.
 

 A non-rackmountable case would require a shelf of some sort, which costs
 money and generally uses up a bit more space in the rack.  I suggest you
 discuss this all with your vendor; they're the only people who know what
 they're willing to do and how much they'll charge for it.

 --Jon Radel
 j...@radel.com
   
The vender I have in mind has a tower price and thats how we are going
so the question is pretty much mute except for future reference
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
Erik Trulsson wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 08:30:50AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
   
 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman
 aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I have a server that is a full tower case and want to co-locate it and
 all the providers list pricing in rackmount units so what value of x
 in xU should I get?
   
 When it comes to rackmounts, 1U = 1.75 inches.  2U would be 3.5
 inches, etc.  I'll let you do the measuring and math. ;)
 

 It might be worth noting that 1U corresponds exactly to the height of
 a typical bay for 5.25 units.


 A normal tower case when lain on the side normally has a height
 of approximately 4U.  Note though that most tower cases are not designed
 to be rackmounted and will not fit in typical rack.
 There are some cases available though that can be used both as
 floor-standing towers, or as rack-mounted cases.

 I suspect that many co-location services either only accepts rack-mountable
 servers, or charge extra for non-rackmounted cases, so it might be worth
 checking that

The only reason I said tower is I am making the server almost identical
to my desktop machine which is the most reliable machine I have had in
my 20 year career and thus am going to be using the same case and such
(only diff is the motherboard model is no longer avail. in ihc9 so I
will have ihc10 but from my reading of -current@ and cvs-@ this is not
an issue)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
Glen Barber wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman
 aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 I have a server that is a full tower case and want to co-locate it and
 all the providers list pricing in rackmount units so what value of x
 in xU should I get?
 

 When it comes to rackmounts, 1U = 1.75 inches.  2U would be 3.5
 inches, etc.  I'll let you do the measuring and math. ;)


   
Small related question is there any long term harm to laying a disk on
it's side (i.e. it lays flat when the tower is up right but on it's side
squeezed into a rack)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
If a hard disk formatted and used in a position , in that position it may be
used if manufacturer is NOT advised a specific position . After loading of
files into hard disk , change of position may cause difficulty in reading of
already recorded data .  This point should be considered .


On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman 
 aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
  Small related question is there any long term harm to laying a disk on
  it's side (i.e. it lays flat when the tower is up right but on it's side
  squeezed into a rack)
 

 The ideal answer is 'no'.  The 'safe' answer is 'possibly'.  In other
 words, I wouldn't do it personally, but I don't expect it to cause
 harm.  I'd suspect it'd be more succeptible to a head crash in a
 vertical position.


 --
 Glen Barber

 Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I
 learn. - Benjamin Franklin
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Peter Boosten



On 4 jan 2009, at 14:35, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com 

Small related question is there any long term harm to laying a disk  
on
it's side (i.e. it lays flat when the tower is up right but on it's  
side

squeezed into a rack)



The ideal answer is 'no'.  The 'safe' answer is 'possibly'.  In other
words, I wouldn't do it personally, but I don't expect it to cause
harm.  I'd suspect it'd be more succeptible to a head crash in a
vertical position.




Most drives in an drive array are on their side, seems not to be any  
problem.


Peter
--
http://www.boosten.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Glen Barber
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman
aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have a server that is a full tower case and want to co-locate it and
 all the providers list pricing in rackmount units so what value of x
 in xU should I get?

When it comes to rackmounts, 1U = 1.75 inches.  2U would be 3.5
inches, etc.  I'll let you do the measuring and math. ;)


-- 
Glen Barber

Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I
learn. - Benjamin Franklin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Glen Barber
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
 Small related question is there any long term harm to laying a disk on
 it's side (i.e. it lays flat when the tower is up right but on it's side
 squeezed into a rack)


The ideal answer is 'no'.  The 'safe' answer is 'possibly'.  In other
words, I wouldn't do it personally, but I don't expect it to cause
harm.  I'd suspect it'd be more succeptible to a head crash in a
vertical position.


-- 
Glen Barber

Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I
learn. - Benjamin Franklin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Wojciech Puchar

1U=4.5cm

On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:


I have a server that is a full tower case and want to co-locate it and
all the providers list pricing in rackmount units so what value of x
in xU should I get?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread perryh
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:

 1U=4.5cm

Approximately :)

At least in the US, 1U = 1.75 inches = 4.445 cm, so an 18cm case
will not quite fit into 4U.  Perhaps metric racks are different.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread perryh
 If a hard disk formatted and used in a position , in that position
 it may be used if manufacturer is NOT advised a specific position.
 After loading of files into hard disk , change of position may
 cause difficulty in reading of already recorded data .  This point
 should be considered .

Sun, at least, used to warn about this back in the MFM/ESDI days,
recommending that a disk should be reformatted if its orientation
were changed, but those drives used all their heads for data and
depended on reproduceable mechanical positioning to align the heads
at the selected cylinder.  I'm not sure it still applies to drives
that dedicate one head to fine-tuning track position by reading
factory-recorded servo patterns.  (Quick check, if actual geometry
is known:  a drive with an odd number of heads most likely has a
dedicated servo surface.)  BTW most drives of that era, while OK on
either side as well as right side up, were *not* supposed to be
run upside down -- the bearings were not designed for that.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Wojciech Puchar



1U=4.5cm


Approximately :)


at least in poland it's said that. i must check in my 12U rack ;)



At least in the US, 1U = 1.75 inches = 4.445 cm, so an 18cm case
will not quite fit into 4U.  Perhaps metric racks are different.

well it will with slight amount of pressure ;) to compensate this 2.8mm
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT: how many rankmount units is a tower-case

2009-01-04 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 12:42:02PM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
  If a hard disk formatted and used in a position , in that position
  it may be used if manufacturer is NOT advised a specific position.
  After loading of files into hard disk , change of position may
  cause difficulty in reading of already recorded data .  This point
  should be considered .
 
 Sun, at least, used to warn about this back in the MFM/ESDI days,
 recommending that a disk should be reformatted if its orientation
 were changed, but those drives used all their heads for data and
 depended on reproduceable mechanical positioning to align the heads
 at the selected cylinder.  I'm not sure it still applies to drives
 that dedicate one head to fine-tuning track position by reading
 factory-recorded servo patterns.  (Quick check, if actual geometry
 is known:  a drive with an odd number of heads most likely has a
 dedicated servo surface.)  BTW most drives of that era, while OK on
 either side as well as right side up, were *not* supposed to be
 run upside down -- the bearings were not designed for that.

That may well have been true back in those days, but reasonably modern
drives[*] do not have those limitations. 

Todays drives can be mounted in any orientation, and should have no problems
being remounted in a new orientation. 


From Western Digital's FAQ:

  Physical mounting of the drive:
  
  WD drives will function normally whether they are mounted sideways or upside
  down (any X, Y, Z orientation). Of course, the physical design of your
  system may limit the positions in which the drive can be mounted. However,
  in all cases, you should mount the drive with all four screws for good
  grounding. Also ensure that there is enough air space around the drive for
  adequate air flow, and avoid mounting the drive near sources of excessive
  heat (such as some CPUs).

From Seagate's FAQ:

  All Seagate  Maxtor's internal hard drives can be fitted sideways or upside
  down. As long as they can not be moved during use and get enough cooling it
  is irrelevant in which direction they are mounted.


From Hitachi's installation guide:

  There are many variations of system cases. Hitachi Deskstar
  drive can be mounted with any side or end vertical or hori-
  zontal. Do not mount the drive in a tilted position.







[*] resonably modern drives includes just about all drives any sane person
would even consider using for a new computer build.

-- 
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org