On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 02:24:29PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On the production systems we use FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10.
>
> Does anybody recognized similar problems?
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE, and the ULE scheduler, are experimental
works-in-progress. Significant ULE improvements have been made in
> Using SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD seems to result in massive
> performance losses in NFS in conjunction with the Intel "em"-NICs.
> Does anybody recognized similar problems?
SCHED_ULE is very much a work-in-progress; I have seen reports
of both instability and perform
Hello.
Using SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD seems to result in massive
performance losses in NFS in conjunction with the Intel "em"-NICs.
We use some Intel P4 based diskless/dataless nodes for numerical
calculations over GBit LAN (all machines have Intel PRO/1000 LAN
NICs) with "clusterit". On t
