On April 6, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
> >> [Updating the portsdb >format:bdb_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 16851
> >> port entries found
> >> {lines cut} . done]
> >> [missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb!
> >> database file error
> >>
> >> {f
Hello Ghirai,
Friday, April 6, 2007, 11:48:29 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Josh,
> Friday, April 6, 2007, 11:08:02 PM, you wrote:
>>> deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
>>> [Updating the portsdb >format:bdb_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 16851
>>> port entries found
>>> {lines cut} . done]
>>> [missing
Hello Josh,
Friday, April 6, 2007, 11:08:02 PM, you wrote:
>> deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
>> [Updating the portsdb >format:bdb_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 16851
>> port entries found
>> {lines cut} . done]
>> [missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb!
>> database file error
>>
>>
deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
[Updating the portsdb >format:bdb_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 16851
port entries found
{lines cut} . done]
[missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb!
database file error
{following some ruby errors regarding the fact that the db can't be
read?!}
Try r
Hello,
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p2, SMP, x86.
I get the following error when using portupgrade (on every port, not
just this one):
deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
[Updating the portsdb >format:bdb_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 16851
port entries found
{lines cut} . done]
[missing key: categorie
||On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:57:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
||>=20
||> For the past month or so I have a couple of ports that will no longer
||> build on upgrade (graphics/libaux and x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings)
||OK, this isn't a problem with portupgrade t
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:57:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> For the past month or so I have a couple of ports that will no longer
> build on upgrade (graphics/libaux and x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings)
OK, this isn't a problem with portupgrade then, it's a pro
For the past month or so I have a couple of ports that will no longer
build on upgrade (graphics/libaux and x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings)
The precise error is:
==> Configuring for libaux-1.0_1
imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config
In file included from Imakefile.c:16:
/usr/X11R6
I get the following when running portversion (or portversion -l '<', or
pkgdb, etc)
=>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> portversion
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 45 packages
found (-3 +4) (...)(? portupgrade-20041226).Abort trap (core dumped)
=>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pkgdb -F
---> Checking the packag
On Friday 03 September 2004 11:23 am, Mark Ovens wrote:
> kstewart wrote:
> > His PACKAGESITE environment variable is set to a wrong location. I think
> > that he needs to set it using something like
> >
> > setenv PACKAGESITE
> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/All
>
kstewart wrote:
His PACKAGESITE environment variable is set to a wrong location. I think that
he needs to set it using something like
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/All
Thanks Kent, but it didn't work. Setting it made it search in
ftp://ftp.fr
>
> On Thursday 02 September 2004 01:45 am, Philip Payne wrote:
> > > > Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and
> > > > recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing.
> > >
> > > OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is
> trying to get it
> > > fro
On Thursday 02 September 2004 01:45 am, Philip Payne wrote:
> > > Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and
> > > recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing.
> >
> > OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is trying to get it
> > from
> > ftp://ftp.fr
> > Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and
> > recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing.
>
> OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is trying to get it
> from
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/All
> where the v
kstewart wrote:
Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and
recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing.
OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is trying to get it
from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/All
where the vers
On Wednesday 01 September 2004 12:41 pm, Mark Ovens wrote:
> FreeBSD postie 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #1:
> Sun Mar 21 19:46:39 GMT 2004
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POSTIE i386
>
> I'm trying to upgrade cups-base on this system, using packages (as the
> machine doesn't rea
FreeBSD postie 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #1:
Sun Mar 21 19:46:39 GMT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POSTIE i386
I'm trying to upgrade cups-base on this system, using packages (as the
machine doesn't really have enough grunt for building ports), with
portupgrade, but it is
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 03:26 pm, "LiQuiD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a machine running 4.10 stable that has a "problem" whenever I try
> to run portsdb -Uu. The message the scrolls down the screen is as
> follows:
>
> /usr/ports/INDEX:11586:Port info line must consist of 1
Hi all,
I have a machine running 4.10 stable that has a "problem" whenever I try
to run portsdb -Uu. The message the scrolls down the screen is as
follows:
/usr/ports/INDEX:11586:Port info line must consist of 10 fields.
That number changes... it basically goes from 0 to that (for all I know)
19 matches
Mail list logo
