RE: Not quite mail relay

2003-09-15 Thread Derrick Ryalls
I think I figured it out. The qmail-smtpd.c patch for SMTP AUTH had an exploit. It did require authentications, but it didn't care what credentials you threw at it, so long as you sent something. On that note, does anyone know of a way to get SMTP AUTH working with qmail without being an

Re: Not quite mail relay

2003-09-15 Thread Gary
Hello Derrick, Monday, September 15, 2003, 10:57:57 AM, you wrote: D I think I figured it out. The qmail-smtpd.c patch for SMTP AUTH had an D exploit. It did require authentications, but it didn't care what D credentials you threw at it, so long as you sent something. Yes, there are/were a

Re: Not quite mail relay

2003-09-13 Thread Gary
Hello Derrick, Saturday, September 13, 2003, 12:02:01 PM, you wrote: D I am looking for a way to further secure a mail server. A mail server is either secure or not, not half way... it's like being half pregnant. If you installed qmail properly and from lifewithqmail.org it is secure by

RE: Not quite mail relay

2003-09-13 Thread Derrick Ryalls
D Ex. D To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] D hotmail ends up with a ton of bounce msgs Bounces are a normal part of email life. D and thinks the server is a relay. No they don't. Email admims look at the last sender IP address in the headers, which is the only

RE: Not quite mail relay

2003-09-13 Thread Gary
Hi Derrick, --On Saturday, September 13, 2003 05:10:17 PM -0700 Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No they don't. Email admims look at the last sender IP address in the headers, which is the only valid address, all others are usually forged. What I am referring to is the unable to deliver