RE: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread Marcel de Reuver
 
 Dear Sir,
  
 I am a computer engineer and I want to learn the FreeBSD OS,
 and I do not have the FreeBSD software and when I have tried
 to download the FreeBSD software form your website, I found
 two Releases one called  New Technology Release: 5.2.1 
 and the other called  Production Release: 4.10  ,
 I got confused which Release to download ???
 Because I do not know the differences between the
 New Technology Release and the Production Release.
 Please tell me the differences between them,
 and which release should I have to download?
 Help me please.
  

You have to read the documentation at the FreeBSD website. Start with: 
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2.1R/early-adopter.html


___

Helpman B.V.
P.O. Box 44, 9700 AA Groningen
Peizerweg 97, 9727 AJ Groningen
The Netherlands

tel +31 (0)50 5217555
fax +31 (0)50 5264878
http://www.helpman.com
___

DISCLAIMER NOTICE
Helpman BV accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences 
of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided, unless that information 
is subsequently confirmed in writing. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on 
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. We advise you to carry out 
your own virus check before opening any attachment, as we cannot accept liability for 
any damage sustained as a result of any software viruses.

If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with the content of 
this email please notify us by telephone on +31 (0)50 5217555 and ask for the 
Communications Department.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread Matthew
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 23:07:07 -0700 (PDT), Younes Al-Hroub
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Sir,
 
 I am a computer engineer and I want to learn the FreeBSD OS,
 and I do not have the FreeBSD software and when I have tried
 to download the FreeBSD software form your website, I found
 two Releases one called  New Technology Release: 5.2.1 
 and the other called  Production Release: 4.10  ,
 I got confused which Release to download ???
 Because I do not know the differences between the
 New Technology Release and the Production Release.
 Please tell me the differences between them,
 and which release should I have to download?
 Help me please.

Also, chapter 19.2 FreeBSD-CURRENT vs. FreeBSD-STABLE of the online
FreeBSD handbook has a nice short description of the differences.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread R. W.
On Thursday 09 September 2004 07:07, Younes Al-Hroub wrote:
 Dear Sir,

 I am a computer engineer and I want to learn the FreeBSD OS,
 and I do not have the FreeBSD software and when I have tried
 to download the FreeBSD software form your website, I found
 two Releases one called  New Technology Release: 5.2.1 
 and the other called  Production Release: 4.10  ,
 I got confused which Release to download ???

At this point, unless you have some critical application that needs the 
proven stability of 4.x, I don't see a good reason for a new user to 
start there. Given that you want it for learning, I would say the 
choice is between 5.2.1  and waiting for 5.3 (which will be a full 
production release) in a few weeks. 

If you plan to use FreeBSD as your main desktop OS you might want to 
wait for 5.3, otherwise the upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.3 shouldn't be too 
hard, and it's part of the learning process.







___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 On Thursday 09 September 2004 07:07, Younes Al-Hroub wrote:
  Dear Sir,
 
  I am a computer engineer and I want to learn the FreeBSD OS,
  and I do not have the FreeBSD software and when I have tried
  to download the FreeBSD software form your website, I found
  two Releases one called  New Technology Release: 5.2.1 
  and the other called  Production Release: 4.10  ,
  I got confused which Release to download ???
 
 At this point, unless you have some critical application that needs the 
 proven stability of 4.x, I don't see a good reason for a new user to 
 start there. Given that you want it for learning, I would say the 
 choice is between 5.2.1  and waiting for 5.3 (which will be a full 
 production release) in a few weeks. 

This is really the opposite of the best official advice that is given.
Unless you have a strong reason for needing 5.xxx, then installing 4.10 
is a good idea.   It is the officially stable production system.   True 
that 5.2.1 is basically quite reliable now, but there is no reason not 
to use the official production release
which is 4.10.   

 If you plan to use FreeBSD as your main desktop OS you might want to 
 wait for 5.3, otherwise the upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.3 shouldn't be too 
 hard, and it's part of the learning process.

It would also be part of the learning process to move from 4.10
to 5.3 which would be a little more radical move when it comes.

For all practical purposes, at this point the argument is really
almost moot.   4.10 is official, but 5.3 is expected to be official
only a few days hence.  Both are in good shape, but 4.10 has fewer
radical changes from previous versions (none) than 5.2.1 and so
is considered to be more stable and also less likely to have something
overlooked in it.

You should read up on how the branching works.  There have been a couple
of well written explanations posted in the last few months and they
could easily be found by searching I believe.   Then, you would understand
and can make your own decision better.

jerry
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 09 September 2004 08:13 am, Jerry McAllister wrote:
  At this point, unless you have some critical application that needs the
  proven stability of 4.x, I don't see a good reason for a new user to
  start there. Given that you want it for learning, I would say the
  choice is between 5.2.1  and waiting for 5.3 (which will be a full
  production release) in a few weeks.

 This is really the opposite of the best official advice that is given.
 Unless you have a strong reason for needing 5.xxx, then installing 4.10
 is a good idea.   It is the officially stable production system.   True
 that 5.2.1 is basically quite reliable now, but there is no reason not
 to use the official production release
 which is 4.10.

I disagree. I think a completely new user should start with 5.x - there's no 
reason to learn the details of how 4.x works, just to have significant 
portions of that knowledge become obsolete in a month. I wouldn't use 5.2.1 
on a production machine, but it's perfectly fine for a desktop or learning 
machine.

  If you plan to use FreeBSD as your main desktop OS you might want to
  wait for 5.3, otherwise the upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.3 shouldn't be too
  hard, and it's part of the learning process.

 It would also be part of the learning process to move from 4.10
 to 5.3 which would be a little more radical move when it comes.

I don't think a new user should try his first make world as a move from 5.2.1 
to 5.3. There are quite a lot of pitfalls along the way, including the 
installation of a new gcc version (there are around 40 entries 
in /usr/src/UPDATING relevant to the upgrade). And I wouldn't wish a 
4.10-to-5.3 source upgrade on anyone (though it is possible).

Personally, I would wait the approximately 3 days until 5.3-BETA4 is 
available, and use that. Then the original poster can play around with 
FreeBSD for a while, and by the time 5.3-RELEASE comes out, might be ready 
for a straightforward source upgrade.

-David

-- 
+++ Divide By Cucumber Error. Please
Reinstall Universe And Reboot. +++
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread eric
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 13:22:15 -0700, David Syphers proclaimed...
 
 I disagree. I think a completely new user should start with 5.x - there's no 
 reason to learn the details of how 4.x works, just to have significant 
 portions of that knowledge become obsolete in a month. I wouldn't use 5.2.1 
 on a production machine, but it's perfectly fine for a desktop or learning 
 machine.

Obsolete? You can't be serious; I don't forsee going to 5.x anytime
in the next year or so.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread David Syphers
On Thursday 09 September 2004 01:57 pm, eric wrote:
 On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 13:22:15 -0700, David Syphers proclaimed...

  I disagree. I think a completely new user should start with 5.x - there's
  no reason to learn the details of how 4.x works, just to have significant
  portions of that knowledge become obsolete in a month. I wouldn't use
  5.2.1 on a production machine, but it's perfectly fine for a desktop or
  learning machine.

 Obsolete? You can't be serious; I don't forsee going to 5.x anytime
 in the next year or so.

Poor choice of words on my part. People are perfectly free to run FreeBSD 2.2, 
and some do. What I meant was, most new users are going to want 5.x, as 
things have advanced significantly from 4.x. For every person like you, who 
won't move to 5.x for at least a year after it's gone -stable (due to large 
numbers of local modifications, production stability concerns, or whatever), 
there's at least one person like me, who went to 5.x years ago even though 
I'm not a developer (did Cardbus support ever make it to 4.x?). I'm not 
recommending that new users go to -current (6.x), but I am saying the system 
administration skills they learn in 5.x will be useful to them much longer 
than those they would learn in 4.x.

-David

-- 
+++ Divide By Cucumber Error. Please
Reinstall Universe And Reboot. +++
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Release to Download?

2004-09-09 Thread Robert Huff

Another framing: if the person is totally new to FreeBSD, the
differences between 4.x and 5.x as a learning environment are
negligible.


Robert Huff


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]