RE: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-16 Thread yance
-Original Message- From: Tino Engel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 16 December 2007 4:53 AM To: Remko Lodder Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; W. D.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Exec

Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-15 Thread Tino Engel
Remko Lodder schrieb: On Fri, December 14, 2007 5:37 pm, W. D. wrote: At 09:50 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote: W. D. wrote: Well, it's been 2 days now. When will the code be updated in the FreeBSD ports? The version on the Samba website is 3.0.28. (http://www.Samba.org/)

RE: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-14 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
eeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote > Code Execution... > > > > Which is ever so irritating... > > In 40 years of lessons learned from the school of hard knocks in > relation to the design and evolution of both programming languages and > the softwar

Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-14 Thread Modulok
On 12/14/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This happens from time to time with the FreeBSD ports system, and > there isn't any way to avoid it. Most open source software > today is written to depend on other open source software > packages. People don't like spending programming

RE: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-14 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of W. D. > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Remko Lodder; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2,1 is forbidden: "

Re: [Samba] Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-14 Thread Charles Marcus
On 12/14/2007, W. D. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: When is it going to be fixed? Does "soon" mean this century? This year? When? Wow... someone needs to think before they speak. This is free software. You are in no position to make demands or whine about things like this. Besides - you're co

Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-14 Thread Remko Lodder
On Fri, December 14, 2007 5:37 pm, W. D. wrote: > At 09:50 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote: >>W. D. wrote: > Well, it's been 2 days now. When will the code be updated > in the FreeBSD ports? The version on the Samba website is > 3.0.28. (http://www.Samba.org/) Why is the FreeBSD ports > versio

Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-14 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:37:10AM -0600, W. D. wrote: > At 09:50 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote: > >W. D. wrote: > Dang! When will this be fixed? > > > >>> Soon, there are patches available, we just need to make sure that it > >>> doesn't bite anything while we are in a ports-slus

Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...

2007-12-14 Thread Paul Procacci
> Well, it's been 2 days now. When will the code be updated > in the FreeBSD ports? The version on the Samba website is > 3.0.28. (http://www.Samba.org/) Why is the FreeBSD ports > version stuck at 3.0.26a_2,1? > > If there are fixes available already on the Samba websites, > why can't they be