ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Philip Payne
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:38 AM
To: 'Ezra Banoba'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: backup static routes for freebsd (default)
Hi,
> I have a gatway box running freebsd 4.8 and several links to
&g
Computer Froniters International
Plot 32 Lumumba Avenue
www.cfi.co.ug
+256 031260485
-Original Message-
From: Philip Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:56 AM
To: Nick Rogness; Ezra Banoba
Cc: Philip Payne
Subject: RE: backup static routes for freebsd (default
hi,
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:52:54PM -0700, Ezra Banoba wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a gatway box running freebsd 4.8 and several links to the internet
> via different ISP's.
> This box is connected directly to one of the ISP's but also has access to
> the other gatways via the LAN.
> I would like t
Hi,
> I have a gatway box running freebsd 4.8 and several links to
> the internet
> via different ISP's.
> This box is connected directly to one of the ISP's but also
> has access to
> the other gatways via the LAN.
> I would like to setup static backup (default) routes such
> that when and if
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:53:55AM -0700, Ezra Banoba wrote:
> Hi,
> It works like magic.
> But then, ... that means I still would have to use a script to mark the
> interface as down when the remote gateway is inaccessible. Or is there a way
> to automagically mark the interface down if the networ
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Ezra Banoba wrote:
> Thanks Phil, I tried some guesswork myself to add the secondary default
> routes router style with weights and that's the only way the route add
> command will accept another default route. I do not know how freebsd
> interpretes this: route add default [ga
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Ezra Banoba wrote:
> Hi, It works like magic. But then, ... that means I still would have to
> use a script to mark the interface as down when the remote gateway is
> inaccessible. Or is there a way to automagically mark the interface down
> if the network is inaccessible?
