Re: Comments on DRAC IV, V, VI w/ FreeBSD 6.3, 7.0

2008-04-11 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 13:39 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Hi All, > > Does anybody have any comments, suggestion, feedback, compatability The DRAC5 is an abomination to professional computer operators everywhere. It runs Linux, and to use the remote VGA console or remote Virtual Media, yo

RE: Comments on DRAC IV, V, VI w/ FreeBSD 6.3, 7.0

2008-04-10 Thread Alpha 4299
@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Comments on DRAC IV, V, VI w/ FreeBSD 6.3, 7.0 > > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Does anybody have any comments, suggestion, feedback, compatability > > notes, etc with DRAC and FreeBSD? > > > > > > As far a

Re: Comments on DRAC IV, V, VI w/ FreeBSD 6.3, 7.0

2008-04-09 Thread Terry Sposato
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Hi All, Does anybody have any comments, suggestion, feedback, compatability notes, etc with DRAC and FreeBSD? As far as I am aware we are using DRAC successfully on Dell Machines at the moment. I believe it is O/S independent though so not sure why there would b

RE: comments

2004-04-19 Thread JJB
Bud Your MS/windows box is the one that has been compromised. Your problem has nothing to do with FreeBSD org, or the FBSD operating system. You need Norton personal firewall and virus checker to cleanup your system and stop it from happening again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: comments

2004-04-19 Thread Ceri Davies
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 07:34:31AM -0500, James T. Harrison wrote: > My server had some apps running that should not have been there. You have a hacker > using your site to gather info on servers. > > What are your plans to stop? What is your phone number and contact name? The perpetrator he

Re: comments

2004-04-19 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
James T. Harrison wrote: My server had some apps running that should not have been there. That is probably true. It's possible that Microsoft Windows(R) is one of them, in this case. You have a hacker using your site to gather info on servers. That doesn't ring true. Your machine is t