At 08:43 PM 8/30/2005, Robert G. wrote:
chkn# du -h
12K.
chkn#
Anyone know what that is? This is a brand new FreeBSD 5.4 install.
A bit of a guess, but it looks like you're running du in a dir that
has no subdirs.
-Glenn
Thanks
--
Robert G.
In the last episode (Aug 30), Robert G. said:
chkn# du -h
12K.
chkn#
Anyone know what that is? This is a brand new FreeBSD 5.4 install.
Did you mean to run df maybe?
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:04:32AM +0400, Alex K wrote:
what do I miss here?
sum of individual file sizes is much more than total in ls and more than du -k
reports
bash-2.05b$ ls -l
total 354112
-rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 98490960 1 ??? 12:29 88479E51B1D77190A2A8C882
-rw-r--r-- 1
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:50:24AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
:
: On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:54:10AM -0500, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: FreeBSD 4.9p7. I have a new Dell PowerEdge 1750 that is giving me fits.
: I have a ~/src directory containing source tarballs that are unpacked.
: A du -s ~/src
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:54:10AM -0500, Eugene Lee wrote:
FreeBSD 4.9p7. I have a new Dell PowerEdge 1750 that is giving me fits.
I have a ~/src directory containing source tarballs that are unpacked.
A du -s ~/src locks up my ssh session and causes it machine to reboot.
No entries in
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 10:51 am, Brian Henning wrote:
does du return the size in KB by default?
thanks
You can try du -h
That's listed in man du
--
Best regards,
Chris
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 10:53 am, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 10:51 am, Brian Henning wrote:
does du return the size in KB by default?
thanks
You can try du -h
That's listed in man du
Sorry - I forgot to answer - Yes
--
Best regards,
Chris
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:55:33AM -0600, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 10:53 am, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 10:51 am, Brian Henning wrote:
does du return the size in KB by default?
thanks
You can try du -h
That's listed in man du
Sorry - I forgot to answer -
Seaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:33 AM
To: Chris
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: du
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:55:33AM -0600, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 10:53 am, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 10:51 am, Brian Henning wrote:
does du return
[ du(1) accuracy ]
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:17:12PM -0600, Henning, Brian wrote:
The only reason why I question it is when I lookup the size in windows
(the directory is shared with samba) I see it as less.
From bsd: 390 /home/henninb/jpg
From windows: 372KB windows
Is it because of
Please don't top-post.
Henning, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only reason why I question it is when I lookup the size in windows
(the directory is shared with samba) I see it as less.
From bsd: 390 /home/henninb/jpg
From windows: 372KB windows
Is it because of the share or the
- Original Message -
From: Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Henning, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 16:15
Subject: Re: du
Please don't top-post.
Henning, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only reason why I question it is when I
first, why does 59375408 + 1348433 != 61337213
df -k /home/henninb
Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on
61337213 59375408 134843398%/home/henninb
I believe your disk has 1% reserved space. See newfs(8)
-m free space %
Hi Brain
Try df -h (h for human readable output I think)Also, in you shell
profile change BLOCKSIZE= to k for kilobytes, M for Megabytes to suit
you needs
Regards
Andrew Kozak
]
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 03:52, Brian Henning wrote:
Greetings:
I would like to use df and du tools to get some stat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul:
You hit the nail right on the head! I did a lsof +L1 and found
stunnel taking up a huge (2148999) amount of space. Killed it,
restarted it and all my space is back! Now, the question is why does
it keep accumulating all that
From: Mike Loiterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Where are the extra 1.6 megs at?
If a running process opens a file and then unlink(2)'s it, the
file will not
show up in the filesystem, and du will not reflect any space it
uses. However, df will.
Paul
So is there any way to reclaim
I'm posting this offline message to the group for others who may be
researching the same problem. Apparently 'stunnel' was the culprit.
Are you familiar with 'lsof'? This utility, in
/usr/ports/sysutils/lsof, will show all open files. It may help you
discover the cause of the problem. I
From: Mike Loiterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Where are the extra 1.6 megs at?
If a running process opens a file and then unlink(2)'s it, the file will not
show up in the filesystem, and du will not reflect any space it uses.
However, df will.
Paul
--
Paul A. Scott
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Loiterman wrote:
This is strange. When I do:
[11:49:09 root@fat_man: /var]# du -sh
7.0M.
but when I do:
[11:49:18 root@fat_man: /var]# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a97M55M34M62%/
/dev/ad0s1f 1.7G 1.2G 403M75%
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-23 17:05:48 -0400:
On 22 Oct 2002, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
Peter Leftwich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then I thought I'd get crafty and
`tar tvf MP3.DONE0415021909MPT.tar the-tarfile.out` thinking I
could later run things through `sort` but I am hung up
On 22 Oct 2002, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
Peter Leftwich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then I thought I'd get crafty and `tar tvf MP3.DONE0415021909MPT.tar
the-tarfile.out` thinking I could later run things through `sort` but I am
hung up on how to get similar output that shows the contents of
Peter Leftwich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then I thought I'd get crafty and `tar tvf MP3.DONE0415021909MPT.tar
the-tarfile.out` thinking I could later run things through `sort` but I am
hung up on how to get similar output that shows the contents of MP3/.
tar cf - MP3/ | tar tvf -
22 matches
Mail list logo
