On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
I think I just got some help on IRC:
is it on the local network of your firewall and not this
computer?
yes!
thats why you can't connect to it
Suggestions on how to fix this problem using pf would be greatly
appreciated though.
Many th
Redd Vinylene wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
I'm trying to connect to my friend's FTP server but I'm getting a "No
route
to host" when trying from my NAT workstation. It works just fine when I
connect fro
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the default route is set. Routing works just fine. In fact, it's
>> been working for years. It's just this one FTP server that it won't connect
>> to.
>>
>
> Then it could be a leg
On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
Yeah, the default route is set. Routing works just fine. In fact,
it's been working for years. It's just this one FTP server that it
won't connect to.
Then it could be a legitimate error being returned by a remote router,
also. traceroute/
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to connect to my friend's FTP server but I'm getting a "No
>> route
>> to host" when trying from my NAT workstation. It works just fine when I
>> connect from my NAT server th
On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
I'm trying to connect to my friend's FTP server but I'm getting a
"No route
to host" when trying from my NAT workstation. It works just fine
when I
connect from my NAT server though.
Internet -> NAT server (192.168.187.1) -> NAT workstation
