Re: [Fwd: Portupgrade Stale Dependency Issue]

2003-12-21 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 09:29:32 -0500
Bob Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:32:34 -0500
> >Bob Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Just ran pkgdb -F per prompt from the portversion program and got
> >the >following
> >>two messages:
> >>
> >>Stale origin: 'textproc/ruby-rdoc': perhaps moved or obsoleted.
> >>-> The port 'textproc/ruby-rdoc' was removed on 2003-12-15 because:
> >>   "integrated into ruby18 and ruby16-shim-ruby18"
> >>-> Hint: ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 is not required by any other package
> >>-> Hint: checking for overwritten files...
> >>-> No files installed by ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 have been overwritten by
> >>other packages.
> >>Deinstall ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 ? [no]
> >>
> >>Appears as though I'm being told that ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 can be
> >removed, >yet the
> >>default selection re deinstall is "no".  Am I missing something?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >As the hint says, you can deintsall it. After you're done with pkgdf
> >-F do a portupgrade -r on ruby18 or ruby16-shim-ruby18, which ever
> >you have.
> >  
> >
> Done.  Just having difficulty understanding some of the logic behind
> the program.   "Deinstall ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 ? [yes]" is easy for me to
> deal with.
>
> >>Second:
> >>Stale dependency: gnome2-2.4.1 -> openldap-client-2.1.23 
> >>(net/openldap21-client):
> >>openldap-client-2.0.27 (score:76%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no]

What I don't know is how the percent is beeing calculated. From my
experince for a percent above 75 is safe to respond yes.

> >It seems that you had down-graded your open-ldap. You now have
> >installed openladap 2.0.27 on you system, but when you've installed
> >gmnome you had 2.1.13; you can either choose:
> >a) yes (or all) and doing so will "point" gnome (or all) "to depend"
> >on openldap-client-2.0.27 or 
> >b) no, terminate pkgbd and do a portupgrade on openldap-client to
> >bring it back to 2.1.xx
> >
> >Choose what you need (if you have something that requires 2.0 do a if
> >not do b.)
> >
> >>I click the default selection "no" and I'm prompted to input a new 
> >>dependency.
> >>Assuming that I need to install openldap-client-2.1.23, I review the
> >>net/openldap21-client port directory and I only find a Makefile.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >And ? That make file sets CLIENT_ONLY=yes and includes the
> >../openldap21-server's Makefile so all is OK. Looking at the places
> >where CLINET_ONLY appears in the Make file tells that You can define
> >to have or not the docs installed and to have WITH_SASL with (Cyrus)
> >SASL2 support.
> >  
> >
> This clearly shows how FreeBSD-challenged I am.
> Thanks for taking the time to respond and explain this process.

No problem.



-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: [Fwd: Portupgrade Stale Dependency Issue]

2003-12-21 Thread Bob Perry
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:32:34 -0500
Bob Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 

Just ran pkgdb -F per prompt from the portversion program and got the 
following
two messages:

Stale origin: 'textproc/ruby-rdoc': perhaps moved or obsoleted.
-> The port 'textproc/ruby-rdoc' was removed on 2003-12-15 because:
  "integrated into ruby18 and ruby16-shim-ruby18"
-> Hint: ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 is not required by any other package
-> Hint: checking for overwritten files...
-> No files installed by ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 have been overwritten by
other packages.
Deinstall ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 ? [no]
Appears as though I'm being told that ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 can be removed, 
yet the
default selection re deinstall is "no".  Am I missing something?
   

As the hint says, you can deintsall it. After you're done with pkgdf -F
do a portupgrade -r on ruby18 or ruby16-shim-ruby18, which ever you
have.
 

Done.  Just having difficulty understanding some of the logic behind the
program.   "Deinstall ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 ? [yes]" is easy for me to deal with.
 

Second:
Stale dependency: gnome2-2.4.1 -> openldap-client-2.1.23 
(net/openldap21-client):
openldap-client-2.0.27 (score:76%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no]
   

It seems that you had down-graded your open-ldap. You now have installed
openladap 2.0.27 on you system, but when you've installed gmnome you had
2.1.13; you can either choose:
a) yes (or all) and doing so will "point" gnome (or all) "to depend" on
openldap-client-2.0.27 or 
b) no, terminate pkgbd and do a portupgrade on openldap-client to bring
it back to 2.1.xx

Choose what you need (if you have something that requires 2.0 do a if
not do b.)
 

I click the default selection "no" and I'm prompted to input a new 
dependency.
Assuming that I need to install openldap-client-2.1.23, I review the
net/openldap21-client port directory and I only find a Makefile.
   

And ? That make file sets CLIENT_ONLY=yes and includes the
../openldap21-server's Makefile so all is OK. Looking at the places
where CLINET_ONLY appears in the Make file tells that You can define to
have or not the docs installed and to have WITH_SASL with (Cyrus) SASL2
support.
 

This clearly shows how FreeBSD-challenged I am.
Thanks for taking the time to respond and explain this process.
Bob Perry

--
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p13 0#
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: [Fwd: Portupgrade Stale Dependency Issue]

2003-12-20 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:32:34 -0500
Bob Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just ran pkgdb -F per prompt from the portversion program and got the 
> following
> two messages:
> 
> Stale origin: 'textproc/ruby-rdoc': perhaps moved or obsoleted.
> -> The port 'textproc/ruby-rdoc' was removed on 2003-12-15 because:
>"integrated into ruby18 and ruby16-shim-ruby18"
> -> Hint: ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 is not required by any other package
> -> Hint: checking for overwritten files...
> -> No files installed by ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 have been overwritten by
> other packages.
> Deinstall ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 ? [no]
> 
> Appears as though I'm being told that ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 can be removed, 
> yet the
> default selection re deinstall is "no".  Am I missing something?

As the hint says, you can deintsall it. After you're done with pkgdf -F
do a portupgrade -r on ruby18 or ruby16-shim-ruby18, which ever you
have.
 
> Second:
> Stale dependency: gnome2-2.4.1 -> openldap-client-2.1.23 
> (net/openldap21-client):
> openldap-client-2.0.27 (score:76%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no]

It seems that you had down-graded your open-ldap. You now have installed
openladap 2.0.27 on you system, but when you've installed gmnome you had
2.1.13; you can either choose:
a) yes (or all) and doing so will "point" gnome (or all) "to depend" on
openldap-client-2.0.27 or 
b) no, terminate pkgbd and do a portupgrade on openldap-client to bring
it back to 2.1.xx

Choose what you need (if you have something that requires 2.0 do a if
not do b.)


> I click the default selection "no" and I'm prompted to input a new 
> dependency.
> Assuming that I need to install openldap-client-2.1.23, I review the
> net/openldap21-client port directory and I only find a Makefile.

And ? That make file sets CLIENT_ONLY=yes and includes the
../openldap21-server's Makefile so all is OK. Looking at the places
where CLINET_ONLY appears in the Make file tells that You can define to
have or not the docs installed and to have WITH_SASL with (Cyrus) SASL2
support.

> If someone can explain what the program is asking, I may be in a
> better position to respond appropriately.


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"