Re: [OT] Apple's contribution to OSX

2004-07-20 Thread Chuck Swiger
Robert Storey wrote:
[ ... ]
First off, apologies for this off-topic post, but I think this is the
only place I'm likely to get an intelligent (and well-informed) answer
to my question. I tried searching the web, but found a confusing and
contradictory bunch of poorly-informed opinions, which wasn't helpful.
It's not clear to me that you are going to obtain anything different by asking 
your questions here.  :-)

I'm writing a news article about Apple's contribution to open source. In
particular, I'm interested in finding out the following:
You ought to ask Ernie Prabhakar, Wilfredo Sanchez, Jordan Hubbard, or someone 
like them at Apple.  Asking about what Apple has done for FreeBSD, or vice 
versa, is like studying one tree out of a forest.  People at Apple have make 
significant contributions on for the Apache 2, Java, Samba, GCC, and such, as 
well as to the BSD projects.

1) How much of FreeBSD did Apple actually use in OSX? If I'm not
mistaken, the Darwin kernel is not related to FreeBSD in any way (or is
that wrong?). Basically, what exactly did Apple gain from FreeBSD?
The Darwin kernel, Mach, is not related to FreeBSD in any way.
Apple mostly started with NetBSD improvements to their NEXTSTEP-derived 
userland based on an old BSD 4.3 version, and since have adopted many changes 
from FreeBSD as well.  Stuff like Unix CLI programs, various standard C 
library fixes and updates, IPFW, KAME's IPv6 stack, things like that.

2) What exactly has Apple contributed back to FreeBSD? (money?
equipment? source code?). Nowadays, does Apple still continue to give
anything back to the FreeBSD community?
I know at least one FreeBSD committer who is working at Apple, so I suppose 
that providing jobs counts as money...?  I don't know about equipment.  Yes, 
to source code.

Apple recently released a bunch of changes and fixes to the MS-DOS filesystem 
 compatibility kernel module, which someone here was looking over.  I'd 
imagine you could find other examples if you looked, to answer the second 
question.

3) How much of OSX today is open source (or "shared source")? Can you
actually see the OSX source code? Can you use any of it?
Others have responded to this with URLs that are more useful, but "lots, 
except for GUI programs", yes, and yes would be my answers.

--
-Chuck
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: [OT] Apple's contribution to OSX

2004-07-20 Thread Jerry McAllister
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> First off, apologies for this off-topic post, but I think this is the
> only place I'm likely to get an intelligent (and well-informed) answer
> to my question. I tried searching the web, but found a confusing and
> contradictory bunch of poorly-informed opinions, which wasn't helpful.
> 
> I'm writing a news article about Apple's contribution to open source. In
> particular, I'm interested in finding out the following:
> 
> 1) How much of FreeBSD did Apple actually use in OSX? If I'm not
> mistaken, the Darwin kernel is not related to FreeBSD in any way (or is
> that wrong?). Basically, what exactly did Apple gain from FreeBSD?
> 
> 2) What exactly has Apple contributed back to FreeBSD? (money?
> equipment? source code?). Nowadays, does Apple still continue to give
> anything back to the FreeBSD community?
> 
> 3) How much of OSX today is open source (or "shared source")? Can you
> actually see the OSX source code? Can you use any of it?
> 
> Because this is off-topic, it might be better if people responded
> directly to my email address rather than this forum. 

Since you have asked it here, if anyone responds, it might as well
be here.   Some people will be interested.  Some might even try 
to tinker.

jerry


>I can be reached at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know that I could ask these questions on an OSX
> forum, but then I'd probably receive 1000 replies from people telling me
> that OSX is the greatest thing since sliced bread - which, even if true,
> has nothing to do with the article I'm writing. And yes, I'm running
> FreeBSD (and Linux) at home, not OSX, but that also has nothing to do
> with the article.
> 
> I appreciate any help I can get on this, and as always I'm happy to
> acknowledge anyone by name in the article for their assistance.
> 
> thanks in advance and best regards,
> Robert
> 
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: [OT] Apple's contribution to OSX

2004-07-19 Thread lbland
Robert,
OSX is the greatest thing since sliced bread
... now that that is out of the way.
to question (3):
try http://developer.apple.com/darwin/
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.3/
it uses a lot of FSF, FreeBSD, etc. just check the header files.
gcc is a GNU licensed product (mac os x/darwin is built with the gcc 
compiler).

I *think* the Apple compiler group is trying to fold all their code 
back into the gcc main stream version.

Don't know about (2).
thanks!-
-lance
Lance Bland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VVI
888-VVI-PLOT
http://www.vvi.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: [OT] Apple's contribution to OSX

2004-07-19 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:56:50 -0400
Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> First off, apologies for this off-topic post, but I think this is the
> only place I'm likely to get an intelligent (and well-informed) answer
> to my question. I tried searching the web, but found a confusing and
> contradictory bunch of poorly-informed opinions, which wasn't helpful.
> 
> I'm writing a news article about Apple's contribution to open source.

 [ ... ]

Your questions or at least part of them has been discussed recently on
chat@ and advocacy@
> Because this is off-topic, it might be better if people responded
> directly to my email address rather than this forum.

Why didn't you use chat@, then ?


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"