Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Jud
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:34:36 +0100, Andrew Boothman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 11:36 pm, Scott Reese wrote: On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 22:10, Andrew Boothman wrote: > On Monday 30 June 2003 7:19 pm, Scott Reese wrote: > > Previously, I had a dual-boot setup with FreeBSD 5.0 and W

Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Andrew Boothman
On Monday 30 June 2003 11:36 pm, Scott Reese wrote: > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 22:10, Andrew Boothman wrote: > > On Monday 30 June 2003 7:19 pm, Scott Reese wrote: > > > Previously, I had a dual-boot setup with FreeBSD 5.0 and Windows XP. I > > > was using booteasy as the boot loader and I had no pro

Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Scott Reese
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 22:10, Andrew Boothman wrote: > On Monday 30 June 2003 7:19 pm, Scott Reese wrote: > > > > Previously, I had a dual-boot setup with FreeBSD 5.0 and Windows XP. I > > was using booteasy as the boot loader and I had no problem booting into > > either Windows or FreeBSD. Howeve

Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Scott Reese
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 22:14, Doug White wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Andrew Boothman wrote: > > > This seems to be a recurring problem after 5-RELEASE. I had exactly the same > > problem, and I know of others that are the same. For some reason -current > > doesn't seem to be inter-operating well

Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Doug White
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Andrew Boothman wrote: > This seems to be a recurring problem after 5-RELEASE. I had exactly the same > problem, and I know of others that are the same. For some reason -current > doesn't seem to be inter-operating well with the WinXP/Win2k loader anymore. > I'm not sure if it

Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Andrew Boothman
On Monday 30 June 2003 7:19 pm, Scott Reese wrote: > > Previously, I had a dual-boot setup with FreeBSD 5.0 and Windows XP. I > was using booteasy as the boot loader and I had no problem booting into > either Windows or FreeBSD. However, I found myself having to reinstall > FreeBSD so I decided t

Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Scott Reese wrote: > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 11:33, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> Scott Reese wrote: >> > After the install, I was able >> > to boot FreeBSD with no problems at all, but when I went to boot up >> > Windows, I received the dreaded 'NTLDR missing' message. >> >> Try marking the Windows parti

Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Scott Reese
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 11:33, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Scott Reese wrote: > > After the install, I was able > > to boot FreeBSD with no problems at all, but when I went to boot up > > Windows, I received the dreaded 'NTLDR missing' message. > > Try marking the Windows partition as active (via fdisk fr

Re: 5.1-RELEASE & Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Chuck Swiger
Scott Reese wrote: After the install, I was able to boot FreeBSD with no problems at all, but when I went to boot up Windows, I received the dreaded 'NTLDR missing' message. Try marking the Windows partition as active (via fdisk from MS-DOS, or /stand/sysinstall), and see whether that does any bet