Chad Perrin wrote:
I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying
that, for instance, the availability of the ath driver contradicts a
claim that security is a top priority of the FreeBSD project. Only if
it was installed and operational by default would that really be
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying
that, for instance, the availability of the ath driver contradicts a
claim that security is a top priority of the FreeBSD project. Only
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying
that, for instance, the availability of the ath driver contradicts a
claim that security is a top priority of
Hi Blake,
On 02/06/07, Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am primarily concerned about security from internet hacking, and am
therefore considering setting up a separate internet computer with BSD.
Are you trying to secure a network with a secure gateway? To have a secure
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:42:33AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
I'm not saying that's what the OpenBSD project does. I'm just saying
that, for instance, the availability of
Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am primarily concerned about security from internet hacking, and am
therefore considering setting up a separate internet computer with BSD.
You shouldn't use FreeBSD, then. It's written by hackers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker
If
Bill Moran wrote:
OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and
motivating factors than any other OS I know.
I disagree. I'd say that OpenBSD and FreeBSD put security in exactly
the same place -- at the top of the list.
I think the distinction to draw is that FreeBSD has a
Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 wrote:
Hello. Hope it's not too tongue-in-chic, but it's practically
irresistable.
I am primarily concerned about security from internet hacking, and am
therefore considering setting up a separate internet computer with BSD.
What is your association with Open BSD?
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:18:33PM -0700, Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 wrote:
I am primarily concerned about security from internet hacking, and am
therefore considering setting up a separate internet computer with BSD.
What is your association with Open BSD? with Linux?
Are there copyright or
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and
motivating factors than any other OS I know.
I disagree. I'd say that OpenBSD and FreeBSD put security in exactly
the same place --
--On June 3, 2007 4:33:01 AM +0200 Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and
motivating factors than any other OS I know.
I disagree. I'd
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 08:53:52PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Blake Finley, MA, ABD-2 wrote:
If you are familiar with Linux, search at Google with the string BSD Linux
Matthew Fuller rant. It's a fairly well thought-through tirade on some of
the
differences Linux users perceive when they
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:33:01AM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
OpenBSD puts security higher on its list of project goals and
motivating factors than any other OS I know.
I disagree. I'd
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:10:08PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 3, 2007 4:33:01 AM +0200 Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. I'd say that OpenBSD and FreeBSD put security in exactly
the same place -- at the top of the list.
Sorry but I have to disagree here.
FreeBSD
14 matches
Mail list logo
