Re: Best Way to Fix a links Browser Compilation Problem

2003-11-05 Thread Mark Woodson
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 01:41 pm, Martin McCormick wrote: > Mark Woodson writes: > >You do not actually need to edit the CONFIGURE_ARGS in Makefile, > >rather you include that statement in your call to make > > > >make WITHOUT_X11=yes install > > My thanks to you and one other person wh

Re: Best Way to Fix a links Browser Compilation Problem

2003-11-05 Thread Martin McCormick
Mark Woodson writes: >You do not actually need to edit the CONFIGURE_ARGS in Makefile, >rather you include that statement in your call to make > >make WITHOUT_X11=yes install My thanks to you and one other person who pointed this out to me. It looks like that is going to work. Martin Mc

Re: Best Way to Fix a links Browser Compilation Problem

2003-11-05 Thread Chris Howells
> I am attempting to install a newer version of the "links" text > browser. The Makefile tells you to > define WITHOUT_X11 if you are not using X so I modified the Makefile > to define that parameter as follows: > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-javascript --with-ssl --without-svgalib > --WIT

Re: Best Way to Fix a links Browser Compilation Problem

2003-11-05 Thread Mark Woodson
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 11:48 am, Martin McCormick wrote: > I am attempting to install a newer version of the "links" text > browser. The Makefile tells you to > define WITHOUT_X11 if you are not using X so I modified the > Makefile to define that parameter as follows: > CONFIGURE_ARGS

Re: Best Way to Fix a links Browser Compilation Problem

2003-11-05 Thread Chris Pressey
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:48:31 -0600 Martin McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am attempting to install a newer version of the "links" text > browser. The Makefile tells you to > define WITHOUT_X11 if you are not using X so I modified the Makefile > to define that parameter as follows: