DK wrote:
Floppy CD mount OK now, however even though the floppy mounts OK, when I
mount the floppy, I get:
127# mount -v -t msdos /dev/fd0 /mnt
/dev/fd0 on /mnt (msdos, local, reads: sync 2 async 0)
floppy: mount -v -t msdos /dev/fd0c /mnt
CDROM: mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /cdrom
However, I
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, DK wrote:
I edited rc.conf added the line: amd_enable=YES
However, my devices(Floppy CDROM) are not automounting after logging in or
starting X ???
In the process view of BSD, I have amd as waiting
Trying to understand man amd isn't helping. Any ideas ???
I currently
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 04:36:57PM -0700, Henrik W Lund wrote:
The command to use is umount, not unmount.
umount /cdrom
Don't ask me why they left out the first 'n' there.
Because typing the sequence u-n-m at speed is really quite difficult.
It's also the reason that it's perl and not
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 04:36:57PM -0700, Henrik W Lund wrote:
The command to use is umount, not unmount.
umount /cdrom
Don't ask me why they left out the first 'n' there.
Because typing the sequence u-n-m at speed is really quite
[Bill Moran, 2004-08-01]
I don't remember where, but I read somewhere that the qwerty layout
was not designed for raw speed (as some people think) but was designed
for speed on _mechanical_ typewriters. i.e. part of it's design is
to maximize the possibility that you'll alternate
DK wrote:
Hi Giorgos,
I don't feel safe yet connecting my unsecured box to the net with the 5-10 hits
a minute my W2000 box recieves on my broadband link. I have read the security
section of the manual would like to get basics working before I rebuild the
kernel to install the firewall(which
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, DK wrote:
... then you maybe right Remko, BSD may not be right for me.
I think it's becoming clear that it's not. You seem to expect FreeBSD to
be 'just like MSWindows, but Better!' - but it's *not* like MSWin, at all.
If you keep expecting to install/adminsiter a UNIX-like
- Original Message -
From: DK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Guillermo_García-Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an
installerpackage like this ???
snip
Can you live without your
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-07-28 22:53, DK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really. But even if we provided examples of this configurability
you wouldn't accept them as valid examples because they wouldn't be
point and click on some wimpy
DK wrote:
--- Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver,
which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel
reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations).
Yes, but not as ONE nice
DK wrote:
--- Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver,
which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel
reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations).
Yes, but not as ONE nice
and
phpnuke to that port.
--
Steve Rieger
ICQ # 5956607
yahoo IM riegersteve
- Original Message -
From: Remko Lodder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't
Hi all,
I wish BSD had a BigApache installer package, as it would make my life easier...
contribution are welcome!
http://www.bigapache.org/
The BigApache Enterprise Ready Server is free software:
This Package provides a full implementation of Apache and
What I have noticed so far about FreeBSD:
FreeBSD is about 5 YEARS behind windows(I would actually say 1990, but people my have
heart
attacks) - apologies to all the hard work put in by BSD contributors!
- with FreeBSD Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI of Windows 2000
is MUCH
.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Budd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an
installerpackage like this ???
snip
...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting
people
15 matches
Mail list logo
