-segmentation fault-
press any key to reboot
Damn damn damn [EMAIL PROTECTED] said, after restarting his
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:44:36 -0600
From: Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Build Frustrations
--On November 19, 2007 11:00:44 PM -0500 Dan Mahoney, System Admin
[EMAIL
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Apache2 is a complete piece of crap. Portable Runtime my ass. Was
there something so wrong with APACI? Apache1.3 built out of the box on
every system in the world.
Using ports is no better. And again, I'll take anything anyone can offer
to
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:17:18PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:19:34PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
I'm of the realization that FreeBSD is a volunteer project, but there's a
recent issue
I don't have the correct computer in front of me at the moment, but I
used to do this DAILY with 1000 different combinations of perl, apr,
httpd, mod_perl.
Its a bit dated at the moment, but it definitely will send you in the
correct direction. And yes, this is on FreeBSD (at the time it was 6.1)
This allowed apache2-non-ports to compile. However the question in my
mind that still bears answering is: why apr would FIND such a library as
installed (i.e. not fail at configure-time) but then fail to compile.
I.e. why does the APR not set CFLAGS and LDFLAGS correctly.
This you should post
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
This allowed apache2-non-ports to compile. However the question in my
mind that still bears answering is: why apr would FIND such a library as
installed (i.e. not fail at configure-time) but then fail to compile.
I.e. why does the APR not set
This may help:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2004-December/010425.h
tml
Cheers,
Brent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Mahoney,
System Admin
Sent: Tuesday, 20 November 2007 1:20 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:19:34PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
I'm of the realization that FreeBSD is a volunteer project, but there's a
recent issue I've hit, and I've contacted nearly EVERYONE I can think of
about it to try and fix, and the response I've gotten has been
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:19:34PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
I'm of the realization that FreeBSD is a volunteer project, but there's a
recent issue I've hit, and I've contacted nearly EVERYONE I can think of
about it to try and
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jerry McAllister wrote:
You can tell ports where to install something. We used to install
all of Apache in its own directory to make it easy to manipulate
in a system we were installing in a lot of places. Check the ports
doc and such.
Actually, I just tried this.
=== apache-worker-2.2.6_2 depends on file:
/usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.61 - not found
===Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.61 in
/usr/ports/devel/autoconf261
=== Returning to build of apache-worker-2.2.6_2
...
buildconf: checking installation...
buildconf: autoconf not
--On November 19, 2007 11:00:44 PM -0500 Dan Mahoney, System Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jerry McAllister wrote:
You can tell ports where to install something. We used to install
all of Apache in its own directory to make it easy to manipulate
in a system we were
--On November 19, 2007 10:17:18 PM -0500 Dan Mahoney, System Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*headdesk, repeatedly*
Apache2 is a complete piece of crap. Portable Runtime my ass. Was
there something so wrong with APACI? Apache1.3 built out of the box on
every system in the world.
I
13 matches
Mail list logo
