Re: Configure to use WITH_DEBUG
In response to White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have a system that I am setting up that will only be used to test programs. I therefore want all programs built with debug code. To facilitate that task, I was wondering if I could put a global flag in the '/etc/make.conf' file. Assuming that would work, which of these is the better solution. 1)WITH_DEBUG 2)WITH_DEBUG=1 3)WITH_DEBUG=true 4)-DWITH_DEBUG If there is a better solution, I would appreciate hearing about it. #2 and #3 will work. The key is that the variable is set, not what it's set to. As a joke, you can do WITH_DEBUG=no in make.conf, and confuse the hell out of other sysadmins. Note that there may be additional port-specific debugging that would not be turned on by the global WITH_DEBUG, but you'll have to handle that on a port-by-port basis. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configure to use WITH_DEBUG
In response to White Hat : I have a system that I am setting up that will only be used to test programs. I therefore want all programs built with debug code. To facilitate that task, I was wondering if I could put a global flag in the '/etc/make.conf' file. Assuming that would work, which of these is the better solution. 1) WITH_DEBUG 2) WITH_DEBUG=1 3) WITH_DEBUG=true 4) -DWITH_DEBUG If there is a better solution, I would appreciate hearing about it. #2 and #3 will work. The key is that the variable is set, not what it's set to. As a joke, you can do WITH_DEBUG=no in make.conf, and confuse the hell out of other sysadmins. Note that there may be additional port-specific debugging that would not be turned on by the global WITH_DEBUG, but you'll have to handle that on a port-by-port basis. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com Interesting. Now if I want to turn DEBUG off for a particular port, would I use: 1)WITH_DEBUG 2)WITH_DEBUG= 3)WITH_DEBUG= One other question. From what I have been reading, the use of 'WITH_DEBUG' also prevents the stripping of debug code when the program is installed. Is that correct, or do I have to use another flag to insure that debug code is not stripped from the installed program? Thanks again! __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configure to use WITH_DEBUG
White Hat wrote:
In response to White Hat :
I have a system that I am setting up that will only be used to test
programs.
I therefore want all programs built with debug code. To facilitate that
task, I
was wondering if I could put a global flag in the '/etc/make.conf' file.
Assuming that would work, which of these is the better solution.
1) WITH_DEBUG
2) WITH_DEBUG=1
3) WITH_DEBUG=true
4) -DWITH_DEBUG
If there is a better solution, I would appreciate hearing about it.
#2 and #3 will work.
The key is that the variable is set, not what it's set to. As a joke,
you can do WITH_DEBUG=no in make.conf, and confuse the hell out of other
sysadmins.
Note that there may be additional port-specific debugging that would
not be turned on by the global WITH_DEBUG, but you'll have to handle
that on a port-by-port basis.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
Interesting. Now if I want to turn DEBUG off for a particular port, would I
use:
1)WITH_DEBUG
2)WITH_DEBUG=
3)WITH_DEBUG=
The make manpage is your friend:
.if ${.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/category/port}
.undef WITH_DEBUG
.endif
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configure to use WITH_DEBUG
White Hat escribió: In response to White Hat : I have a system that I am setting up that will only be used to test programs. I therefore want all programs built with debug code. To facilitate that task, I was wondering if I could put a global flag in the '/etc/make.conf' file. Assuming that would work, which of these is the better solution. 1) WITH_DEBUG 2) WITH_DEBUG=1 3) WITH_DEBUG=true 4) -DWITH_DEBUG If there is a better solution, I would appreciate hearing about it. #2 and #3 will work. The key is that the variable is set, not what it's set to. As a joke, you can do WITH_DEBUG=no in make.conf, and confuse the hell out of other sysadmins. Note that there may be additional port-specific debugging that would not be turned on by the global WITH_DEBUG, but you'll have to handle that on a port-by-port basis. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com Interesting. Now if I want to turn DEBUG off for a particular port, would I use: 1)WITH_DEBUG 2)WITH_DEBUG= 3)WITH_DEBUG= #2 or #3. Also, take a look at ports-mgmt/portconf. One other question. From what I have been reading, the use of 'WITH_DEBUG' also prevents the stripping of debug code when the program is installed. Is that correct, or do I have to use another flag to insure that debug code is not stripped from the installed program? Yes, it's true. There might be some weird ports, which do things in a non-standard way, this might not apply to those, but for the most of our ports, which respect the most important macros, it is going to work. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .:|:. [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
