On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:46:18 -0800
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub won't compile (it's
architecture is forced to i386 only in the Makefile. I haven't dug
into why, but I'm confident there is a reason. Obviously, grub
becomes a non-option.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub won't compile (it's
architecture is forced to i386 only in the Makefile. I haven't dug
RW wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub won't compile (it's
architecture is forced to i386 only in the Makefile. I haven't dug