Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-03 Thread Chris Howells
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Monday 03 November 2003 04:54, Chris wrote: > I too opted for Kmail. Does what I need it to do, filters, uses encryption > - I wish tho it had the calendaring that Outlook has. You'll probably like Kontact then, version 0.8 of which will be pa

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-03 Thread Chris Howells
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Monday 03 November 2003 05:42, C. Ulrich wrote: > hated having to wait and wait for the ENTIRE KDE SUBSYSTEM to start up "Entire KDE subsystem" is somewhat misleading. kdeinit will be launched which will want to run kbuildsycoca to check for

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-03 Thread andi payn
Notice that everyone praising Evolution or Kmail used their mailer of choice to compose the message in question, but: Harald Schmalzbauer: > User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 > Well, even this incredible slow thunderbird was better than evolution IMHO. Scratch one vote for Thunderbird (leaving 0). Sebasti

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Frank Knobbe
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 22:54, Chris wrote: > Evolution is slick. I loved it - but the fact remains that it is bloated and > runs horrid if you happen to save messages, and they are in the k's. The secret to get Evolution to run decent is to use the maildir format instead of mbox for all message f

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Chris
On Sunday 02 November 2003 11:42 pm, C. Ulrich wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 18:50, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > (I love pine and kmail for GUI) > > I used to use kmail quite a while back and loved it. I eventually quit > using it and went to Mozilla mail because I ran the GNOME desktop and > ha

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread C. Ulrich
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 18:50, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > (I love pine and kmail for GUI) I used to use kmail quite a while back and loved it. I eventually quit using it and went to Mozilla mail because I ran the GNOME desktop and hated having to wait and wait for the ENTIRE KDE SUBSYSTEM to start

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread andi payn
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:50, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Well, even this incredible slow thunderbird was better than evolution IMHO. I have a pretty complicated setup--multiple identities, even more IMAP mailboxes, mailing lists that I want to filter into separate folders and auto-purge, a Palm t

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Monday 03 November 2003 00:21, parv wrote: > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > wrote sebastian ssmoller thusly... *SNIP* > Would it be too doggedly of me to suggest to use mutt instead? I mean > just look at it... > > # cd /usr3/ports/mail/mutt > # make pretty-print-build-depends-list > T

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread parv
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote sebastian ssmoller thusly... > > so to be more precise: > > $ cd /usr/ports/mail/evolution > $ make pretty-print-build-depends-list > > This port requires package(s) "ORBit2-2.8.2 > XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 > XFree86-libraries-4.

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 20:25, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:26, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 20:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:06, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > so i have to install a lot of gnome stuff to be a

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:26, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 20:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:06, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > > > hi, > > > so i have to install a lot of gnome stuff to be able to use evolution > > > right ? thats bad :( ... i wonder if

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 20:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:06, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > > hi, > > so i have to install a lot of gnome stuff to be able to use evolution > > right ? thats bad :( ... i wonder if all these dependencies are really > > necessary ... > > Everyth

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:06, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > hi, > so i have to install a lot of gnome stuff to be able to use evolution > right ? thats bad :( ... i wonder if all these dependencies are really > necessary ... Everything Evo ropes in (except for gnomepilot2) is a required dependency (

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread sebastian ssmoller
hi, so i have to install a lot of gnome stuff to be able to use evolution right ? thats bad :( ... i wonder if all these dependencies are really necessary ... anyway: thx for ur help seb On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 18:38, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 13:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrot

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 13:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > On Sunday 02 November 2003 19:00, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 08:46, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > > > hi, > > > recently i set up a new freebsd current. i want to use xfce4 as > > > desktop/window manager but also evolu

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Sunday 02 November 2003 19:00, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 08:46, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > > hi, > > recently i set up a new freebsd current. i want to use xfce4 as > > desktop/window manager but also evolution as mail client. i had a look > > at the dependencies of evolu

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 08:46, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > hi, > recently i set up a new freebsd current. i want to use xfce4 as > desktop/window manager but also evolution as mail client. i had a look > at the dependencies of evolution and found out that evolution depends on > the whole gnome2 deskt

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Sunday 02 November 2003 14:46, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > hi, > recently i set up a new freebsd current. i want to use xfce4 as > desktop/window manager but also evolution as mail client. i had a look > at the dependencies of evolution and found out that evolution depends on > the whole gnome2