Re: FIRST INSTALL QUESTION

2003-12-01 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
[cc'd back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:29:56 -0800
ADSBANNERS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 20031130:09:24gmt-8 las vegas nv 89102
 
 Thanks for the information. 

My plesure.

 What do you mean by unregistered?  

I supose you refer to my signature. Well the short story is an allusion
at some linux users, their 
Linux registered user #nnn 
signatureand the way some of them see the rest of the world based on how
small the number is -- how old linux user one is. The ideea came to me
from a [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread a few years ago and basicaly want to say
that not the age is important but what you know and learn. I'm using
FreeBSD since 2.2.4 but I know a few people that learned more that me in
just a few months ;) It is also an allusion at the activation,
registering and the rest wonderfull things of M$.

 I want to
 explain what I meant about booting to DOS from Windows 98 Start-up Menu. Can
 I do the following (C: bootable; D: orig formatted FAT32 not bootable to
 Windows, 2  partitions - 1 FAT32, 1 BSD)..
 
 1. Boot to Windows Start-up Menu
 2. Choose 'Command Prompt Only'
 3. C:CD D:
 4.D:FBSDBOOT.EXE
 
 If that would work I think it would be the most attractive to me. The file
 FBSDBOOT.EXE sounds like magic.. it must be a Windows package, yes? 

DOS to be more exact.

 Could
 you possibly Format FDisk one of the new portable USB2.0 drives, install DOS
 6.2 on one partition and FreeBSD on another and take the server w/ you?

Yes.

 the latest distribution of FreeBSD support USB 2.0? 

Depending on the MB yes or no. See the hardware notes for the release
you whant to use.

 I'm dreamin' here but I
 am scrambling because XP is a can of worms and Longhorn will be worse.

As I didn't / don't use FBSDBOOT.EXE I can not say much about it. You
might what to review: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37734
and the thead
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2003-July/001942.html 

As far as I know this utility is usefull on some older BIOSes that don't
know LBA but could also be used to skip installing the MBR code
(BootEasy, which I trust more).


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FIRST INSTALL QUESTION

2003-11-30 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:58:55 -0800
ADSBANNERS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 20031129  LAS VEGAS NV 89102 USA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 SUBJECT:  FIRST INSTALL QUESTION
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/multi-os/ch5.html
 
 I purchased SAMS FreeBSD (4.7) in 24 Hours and everything is pretty clear,
 except there isn't any example (neither on freebsd.org) that precisely
 reflects my hardware configuration, namely..
 
 Pentium II w/ orig 10GB HDD (now clean install WIN98SE) + 2d (HDD01) 40GB
 HDD which is not bootable, used only for backup (local and LAN). My updated
 hp Phoenix BIOS v 1.09 w/LBA support recognised the second hard drive w/o
 problem and it works fine.
 
 I was hoping that I could partition only the 2d hard drive and install the
 boot manager included on the CD (easy boot I guess) on the 2d hard drive,
 until I read the FAQs online that mentioned this boot manager uses the MBR -
 which must be located on the original, bootable hard drive (I have never
 used a boot manager unless Windows 98 Start-up Menu qualifies).

You should install FreeBSD's boot manager (it's the easy way) on the
firts disc (ad0) and on the disk on which you put FreeBSD. When booting
it will promt you with something like: 
F1 DOS 
F5 Drive 2

If you'll choose F1 it will boot you win98 (and you will get here the
Windows 98 Start-up Menu).
If you'll choose F5 it will promt with something like:
F1 DOS
F2 FreeBSD
F5 Drive 1
choose F2 to boot FreeBSD.

man boot0cfg

You might want do dig from the following link:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=boot0cfgapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+5.1-RELEASE+and+Portsformat=html


 The FreeBSD `boot0' boot manager permits the operator to select from
 which disk and slice an i386 machine (PC) is booted.

 Note that what are referred to here as ``slices'' are typically called
 ``partitions'' in non-BSD documentation relating to the PC.  Typically,
 only non-removable disks are sliced.

 The boot0cfg utility optionally installs the `boot0' boot manager on the
 specified disk; and allows various operational parameters to be config-
 ured.

 On PCs, a boot manager typically occupies sector 0 of a disk, which is
 known as the Master Boot Record (MBR).  The MBR contains both code (to
 which control is passed by the PC BIOS) and data (an embedded table of
 defined slices).


 
 But then I noticed a reference (link above) to booting from DOS using
 FBSDBOOT.EXE and that got me to wondering if I could just partition ½ of the
 2d hard drive for FreeBSD, install FreeBSD on that partition 

Yes, you could.

 and then boot
 to it using the Windows 98 Start-up Menu / DOS. 

Nop. It work like this:
1. The BIOS loads the code from MBR of the boot disk.
2. The MBR choose (or promt you to choose) what to load next.
3. This is where Windows 98 Start-up Menu get the control.

 Would FBSDBOOT.EXE find the
 BSD partition on the 2d hard drive? Would I just locate FBSDBOOT.EXE on the
 Windows partition of the 2d hard drive?
 
 Of course I'm trying to avoid partitioning the orig hard drive w/ WIN98SE,
 and I'd like to use the slave hard drive for both WIN98 backup and FreeBSD.
 Thank you.

Installing FreeBSD's boot manager wil not break anything on you win98
install and doe not presume repartitionig.


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FIRST INSTALL QUESTION

2003-11-30 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 SUBJECT:  FIRST INSTALL QUESTION
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/multi-os/ch5.html
 
 I was hoping that I could partition only the 2d hard drive and install the
 boot manager included on the CD (easy boot I guess) on the 2d hard drive,
 until I read the FAQs online that mentioned this boot manager uses the MBR -
 which must be located on the original, bootable hard drive (I have never
 used a boot manager unless Windows 98 Start-up Menu qualifies).


Just a little clarification here.   Maybe that is all you need to
figure it out.

When the BIOS boots first, before anything on the disk gets going, it
tries to hand control over to boot managers on its list of bootable devices.
Usually nowdays that list is, in order: The floppy drive, the CD, the first
hard drive.   If it doesn't gind anything on the floppy, it goes to the CD,
if it finds nothing there for booting, it goes to the HD.   So, the first
HD has to have something there to accept the handoff from the BIOS.
This is the MBR.

Generally a basic MBR, like the default one in FreeBSD does a couple of
minor things and then looks for bootable slices.
It looks at the boot block of each disk slice on each disk that it
can talk with.   It then gives you a menu and lets you select which
of those slices to boot from.   The default FreeBSD MBR is very functional
but very basic.  It only knows names for a few types of bootable slices.
But, it can set up and hand off controll to any of them that follow
standard boot brocedures - even if it doesn't have a name for it.

When the MBR hands off control, the slice boot record takes over
and continues booting - mainly brings in a kernel to get things
really going.

In FreeBSD this is done with two utilities.   Fdisk not only makes
the slices of a disk, but it also installs the MBR if told to and
it marks slices as bootable or not.

THen disklabel, divides the slices in to partitions and it also
writes the boot record in to the slice if told to do so.

This can all be done from the sysinstall utility during initial
installation because it invokes these utilities when needed with
the needed switches and parameters.  All you have to do is tell
it if the disk needs an MBR and if the slice should be bootable.

Of course, if you have enough of a system running to boot at least to
single user mode and run fdisk and disklabel yourself, you can run
these as you please.  This is especially so when you are setting up
a second disk - possibly as some type of backup or development disk.

Note that some sort of MBR that knows how to boot all the possible 
slice types (eg be able to hand of control to the slice boot block) 
must be on the first disk.If the WIn-98 MBR can boot the FreeBSD 
slice, then it is fine.  I have heard that Win-98 won't do that.
But, the FreeBSD MBR will boot the Win-98, Win-95, Win-XP, etc slices
just as well as it does a FreeBSD slice.   It just calls the Win-9x
slices MSDOS and the XP unknown or something like that, but it works.

jerry


 But then I noticed a reference (link above) to booting from DOS using
 FBSDBOOT.EXE and that got me to wondering if I could just partition ½ of the
 2d hard drive for FreeBSD, install FreeBSD on that partition and then boot
 to it using the Windows 98 Start-up Menu / DOS. Would FBSDBOOT.EXE find the
 BSD partition on the 2d hard drive? Would I just locate FBSDBOOT.EXE on the
 Windows partition of the 2d hard drive?
 
 Of course I'm trying to avoid partitioning the orig hard drive w/ WIN98SE,
 and I'd like to use the slave hard drive for both WIN98 backup and FreeBSD.
 Thank you.
 
 --rs
 ~+
 
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]