8 PM
> To: James A. Coulter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
>
>
> Look back at the ipfw sample rule set and you will see that
> there are both udp and tcp protocol access to DSN. Also not
> that udp does not use setup ke
On 2004-07-31 20:07, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now many home LAN environments have ms/windows boxes and that system
> is the target of all the adware and spyware programs. These
> unauthorized programs all most always use non-standard ports to
> phone home and report on your activity. The on
een this before. Would you
please share with me and the other readers how you do this.
Thanks
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Giorgos
Keramidas
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 6:43 PM
To: JJB
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewa
[-- Message reformatted to fix Outlook format --]
On 2004-07-31 14:17, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote on July 31, 2004 1:36 PM
>>On 2004-07-31 12:08, "James A. Coulter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> My LAN is configured with static IP addresses, 192.168.1.x.
>>>
>>> I have
Giorgos
Keramidas
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 1:36 PM
To: James A. Coulter
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
On 2004-07-31 12:08, "James A. Coulter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My LAN is configured with
: Saturday, July 31, 2004 2:03 PM
To: James A. Coulter
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
> My LAN is configured with static IP addresses, 192.168.1.x.
>
> I have no problems communicating within the LAN.
>
> I have fu
L PROTECTED] Behalf Of James A.
Coulter
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
My LAN is configured with static IP addresses, 192.168.1.x.
I have no problems communicating within the LAN.
I h
hernet address: 00:04:5a:76:55:f0
> miibus0: on dc0
> ukphy0: on miibus0
> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
> dc1: port 0xa800-0xa8ff mem
> 0xe0800000-0xe08000ff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0
> dc1: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:33:e1:f6
> miibus1: on dc1
> dcphy0:
On 2004-07-31 12:08, "James A. Coulter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My LAN is configured with static IP addresses, 192.168.1.x.
>
> I have no problems communicating within the LAN.
>
> I have full connectivity with the internet from every machine on my LAN when
> the firewall is open.
>
> When I u
based forwarding
enabled, default to deny, logging limited to 10 packets/entry by default
ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device
ad0: 19623MB [39870/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33
acd0: CDROM at ata0-slave PIO4
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
Thanks,
Jim C.
> -Original
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
Thanks for the response. . .
I changed rule 5 from x10 to dc0 - thanks
Not sure why I would want my inside nic requesting DHCP service from
my ISP.
It has been working fine in the configuration I have it so I've le
---
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JJB
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 1:20 PM
> To: James A. Coulter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers?
>
>
> Change this ipfw rule from
>
> 5
Change this ipfw rule from
5 allow ip from any to any via xl0
To
5 allow ip from any to any via dc0
because dc0 is the lan interface name and not xl0.
Change these statement in rc.conf because you have interface name
backwards.
Dc1 is the NIC connected to your cable modem and you w
13 matches
Mail list logo
