Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-09 Thread Weihang Wang

On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:47 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:

 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode?
 
 
 Seems like you already know how since you do it below.
 
 
 I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it to
 bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of my
 system.
 Then in my virtual machine, I add one line:
 ifconfig_em0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf file.
 I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I
 could not get network access.
 
 
 ifconfig_em0=DHCP would only work for the intel adapters, not amd ones.
 
 
 If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do
 need the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my
 experiment.
 
 
 You do have a DHCP server correct?  What happens when you do dhclient
 em0?  Does bridged networking work with a different guest OS as maybe it's
 some problem with your host.
 
 -- 
 Adam Vande More
 

Hi, 

I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are 
several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I 
need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server? Where it 
should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the host OS, two VMs 
(both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two VMs communicate with 
each other. 

Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS FreeBSD 6.0 
could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then?

When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER results 
during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received. 


Thanks,
W.W.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-09 Thread Chris Brennan
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:

  Hi,

 I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are
 several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I
 need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server? Where it
 should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the host OS, two VMs
 (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two VMs communicate with
 each other.

 Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS FreeBSD
 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then?

 When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER
 results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received.



It would appear that Ubuntu has not correctly installed the bridging
adapter. Did you check out the links I provided on setting up a bridging
device on Ubuntu w/ vBox? They worked for me, I set up an Ubuntu VM and in
the VM setup a test VM of vBox to boot fbsd (8.1 in my case).

NOTE: I do not recoomend setting up a VM within a VM, I did it strictly as a
test to boot and get network access. Which it did.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-09 Thread Weihang Wang

On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are
 several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I
 need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server? Where it
 should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the host OS, two VMs
 (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two VMs communicate with
 each other.
 
 Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS FreeBSD
 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then?
 
 When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER
 results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received.
 
 
 
 It would appear that Ubuntu has not correctly installed the bridging
 adapter. Did you check out the links I provided on setting up a bridging
 device on Ubuntu w/ vBox? They worked for me, I set up an Ubuntu VM and in
 the VM setup a test VM of vBox to boot fbsd (8.1 in my case).
 
 NOTE: I do not recoomend setting up a VM within a VM, I did it strictly as a
 test to boot and get network access. Which it did.
 __

Hi,

I am sorry I don't know which page you refer to... I am confusing now cause 
first, I don't know which mode could be best for my needs. What I need is two 
VMs on a real machine, these two VMs could communicate with each other. It 
seems bridged mode is suitable here. But there is no network access for bridged 
mode. 

BTW, when I use NAT mode, two VMs get the same IP address, and they could not 
get to each other.

Thanks,
W.W.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-09 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:

 I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are
 several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I
 need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server?


Bridged networking makes the guest behave like another physical installation
with respect to networking.  If your network doesn't have a DHCP server then
for DHCP to work one is required.  You don't need DHCP for networking
however, you could simply assign static addresses.


 Where it should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the host
 OS, two VMs (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two VMs
 communicate with each other.


Why are you using such an old version of FreeBSD?

Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS FreeBSD
 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then?


In NAT mode, VirtualBox provides it's internal DHCP server.

When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER
 results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received.




-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-09 Thread Chris Brennan
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:



Clipped for brevity.

https://help.*ubuntu*.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking
https://wiki.*ubuntu*.com/VirtualBox
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=667952
http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#id2741763

Here are the links that should help you, I *suggested* you read them this
time and learn how to install, configure and use the bridging adapter.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-09 Thread Weihang Wang

On Dec 9, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
 
 I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are
 several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I
 need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server?
 
 
 Bridged networking makes the guest behave like another physical installation
 with respect to networking.  If your network doesn't have a DHCP server then
 for DHCP to work one is required.  You don't need DHCP for networking
 however, you could simply assign static addresses.
 
 
 Where it should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the host
 OS, two VMs (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two VMs
 communicate with each other.
 
 
 Why are you using such an old version of FreeBSD?
 
 Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS FreeBSD
 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then?
 
 
 In NAT mode, VirtualBox provides it's internal DHCP server.
 
 When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER
 results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received.
 
 
 

Hi,

I have to use FreeBSD 6.0 because the network stack I will test is only based 
on 6.0. BTW, I am using internal networking mode now, these two VMs could 
communicate with each other now. This mode seems could satisfy my needs, 
because my VMs only need to communicate with each other, not with the outside 
world.
Thank you so much for help.

Best,
W.W.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-09 Thread Weihang Wang

On Dec 9, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
 
 
 
 Clipped for brevity.
 
 https://help.*ubuntu*.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking
 https://wiki.*ubuntu*.com/VirtualBox
 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=667952
 http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#id2741763
 
 Here are the links that should help you, I *suggested* you read them this
 time and learn how to install, configure and use the bridging adapter.
 

Hi,

I do read these documents already. Anyway, I have changed the mode the internal 
networking mode, it works fine.Thank you so much for your help.

Best,
W.W.___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-08 Thread Weihang Wang

On Dec 3, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Timm Wimmers wrote:

 Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang:
 Hi Martes,
 
 I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by 
 FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel 
 PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT mode, it works now
 Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for Chris!
 
 In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM get a
 private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM,
 because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as your
 HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you define
 routes, but bridging is mostly easier.
 
 In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network and
 will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP).
 
 -- 
 Timm
 
 [1] HSOT = your Ubuntu Workstation
 

Hi,

Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode?

I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it to bridged 
mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of my system. 
Then in my virtual machine, I add one line:
ifconfig_em0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf file.
I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I could 
not get network access. 

If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do need 
the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my experiment.

Hope to hear from you. Thanks in advance.

Best,
W.W.___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-08 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:

 Hi,

 Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode?


Seems like you already know how since you do it below.


 I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it to
 bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of my
 system.
 Then in my virtual machine, I add one line:
 ifconfig_em0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf file.
 I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I
 could not get network access.


ifconfig_em0=DHCP would only work for the intel adapters, not amd ones.


 If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do
 need the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my
 experiment.


 You do have a DHCP server correct?  What happens when you do dhclient
em0?  Does bridged networking work with a different guest OS as maybe it's
some problem with your host.

-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-08 Thread Chris Brennan
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:

 Hi,

 Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode?

 I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it to
 bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of my
 system.
 Then in my virtual machine, I add one line:
 ifconfig_em0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf file.
 I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I
 could not get network access.

 If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do
 need the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my
 experiment.

 Hope to hear from you. Thanks in advance.


Weihang,

Basically what you want to do is select bridging in your vBox settings for
your VM. Then select your real system's ethernet adapter, expand the little
drop down below that and it will allow you to choose which vNIC you want. I
choose the Intel 82545EM device which gives me an em0 vNIC. in my FreeBSD VM
I have the following three lines pertaining to setting up my network

sshd_enable=YES
ifconfig_em0=inet 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0
defaultrouter=192.168.0.1
hostname=freebsd-bsd.xaerolimit.net

and of course, that hostname does resolve on my lan, but that's not what
this e-mail is about. Hope this helps.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-04 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 03/12/2010 09:25, Timm Wimmers wrote:
 Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang:
 Hi Martes,

 I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by 
 FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel 
 PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT mode, it works now
 Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for Chris!
 
 In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM get a
 private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM,
 because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as your
 HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you define
 routes, but bridging is mostly easier.
 
 In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network and
 will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP).
 

Hmmm I don't know about bridge mode being appropriate in most
cases.  NAT and bridge modes are useful in different circumstances

   * NAT mode means that your VMs are not exposed to incoming
 connections on the net.
   * Bridge mode means that the VMs can run network services
 for users on other machines.

Which one of those you prefer depends very much on how you're using the
VMs.  Eg. for a dev playground and for local testing, NAT looks like a
better idea.

Now, I run VirtualBox on my Mac with FreeBSD (inter alia) as a guest OS.
 Your setup may differ, but I find NAT mode to be the best choice.
In addition to the considerations above, I also see:

   * In NAT mode, the FreeBSD guest is insulated from how the Mac
 connects to the network.  Switching between wired or wireless
 networking, or even using a 3G dongle just works as far as
 the FreeBSD guest is concerned.
   * Similarly if the MAC gets a new IP when switching between
 different networks and DHCP servers, the guest OS just doesn't
 care.

You don't need to worry about configuring routing and so forth in the
guests: just use DHCP for the i/f, and it all works automagically.

Actually, I generally enable two network interfaces for unixoid guests
(ie. capable of running sshd) -- set to NAT and vboxnet0.  This means I
can ssh into local guest OSes from a Terminal.app session, which I find
more convenient than logging in via the console.  Again, it's all
configured effortlessly with DHCP.

My only complaint is that IPv6 doesn't work in these modes, but I can
live with that.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-04 Thread Weihang Wang
Hi,

Thank you so much for your advices. I am using NAT mode now. Just as you said, 
there is no need to configure DHCP in /etc/rc.conf. I just choose the Intel 
PRO/1000 T Server as my virtual network interface. It works well. 
Thank you very much. : )

Best,
W.W.


On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:

 On 03/12/2010 09:25, Timm Wimmers wrote:
 Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang:
 Hi Martes,
 
 I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by 
 FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel 
 PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT mode, it works now
 Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for Chris!
 
 In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM get a
 private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM,
 because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as your
 HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you define
 routes, but bridging is mostly easier.
 
 In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network and
 will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP).
 
 
 Hmmm I don't know about bridge mode being appropriate in most
 cases.  NAT and bridge modes are useful in different circumstances
 
   * NAT mode means that your VMs are not exposed to incoming
 connections on the net.
   * Bridge mode means that the VMs can run network services
 for users on other machines.
 
 Which one of those you prefer depends very much on how you're using the
 VMs.  Eg. for a dev playground and for local testing, NAT looks like a
 better idea.
 
 Now, I run VirtualBox on my Mac with FreeBSD (inter alia) as a guest OS.
 Your setup may differ, but I find NAT mode to be the best choice.
 In addition to the considerations above, I also see:
 
   * In NAT mode, the FreeBSD guest is insulated from how the Mac
 connects to the network.  Switching between wired or wireless
 networking, or even using a 3G dongle just works as far as
 the FreeBSD guest is concerned.
   * Similarly if the MAC gets a new IP when switching between
 different networks and DHCP servers, the guest OS just doesn't
 care.
 
 You don't need to worry about configuring routing and so forth in the
 guests: just use DHCP for the i/f, and it all works automagically.
 
 Actually, I generally enable two network interfaces for unixoid guests
 (ie. capable of running sshd) -- set to NAT and vboxnet0.  This means I
 can ssh into local guest OSes from a Terminal.app session, which I find
 more convenient than logging in via the console.  Again, it's all
 configured effortlessly with DHCP.
 
 My only complaint is that IPv6 doesn't work in these modes, but I can
 live with that.
 
   Cheers,
 
   Matthew
 
 -- 
 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-03 Thread Timm Wimmers
Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang:
 Hi Martes,
 
 I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by 
 FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel 
 PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT mode, it works now
 Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for Chris!

In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM get a
private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM,
because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as your
HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you define
routes, but bridging is mostly easier.

In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network and
will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP).

-- 
Timm

[1] HSOT = your Ubuntu Workstation

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-03 Thread Chris Brennan
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:

 Hi Martes,

 I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by
 FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel
 PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT mode, it works now
 Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for
 Chris!

 Best,
 W.W.


Good, glad it works for you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-03 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko

03.12.2010 04:03, Weihang Wang wrote:

I am running FreeBSD 8.1 in Virtualbox OSE as a guest OS on Ubuntu. Now the guest OS does not have network 
access. When using ifconfig, the virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST 
III) has no IP address. I have configured ifconfig_le0/pcn0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf. But it still 
has no network access. In the virtualbox, I choose the networking mode Bridged or 
NAT, they don't work, either. I found in the virtualbox the name of this virtual network 
interface is eth0. But when i use ifconfig, there is no eth0 in this operating system. I am a little mass and 
struggling in this problem several days and could not find a solution from the Internet.
Hope who have ideas about this could give me some possible solutions.
Thanks in advance.


If you do use amd64 version of freebsd try not to stick to the hardware 
from the ISA days.


--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-02 Thread Martes G Wigglesworth


On 12/02/2010 09:03 PM, Weihang Wang wrote:

Now the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the virtual 
ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST III) has 
no IP address.

Have you attempted to select different available network interfaces?

I have a similar issue when I first started using virtualbox, and it was 
due to not having the correct interface drop-down option from within the 
Settings tab on the VirtualBox Gui. (Where all the VMs are listed.)


--
Respectfully,


Martes G Wigglesworth
M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC
www.mgwigglesworth.net

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access

2010-12-02 Thread Weihang Wang
Hi Martes,

I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by 
FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel 
PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT mode, it works now
Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for Chris!

Best,
W.W.

On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:55 PM, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:

 
 On 12/02/2010 09:03 PM, Weihang Wang wrote:
 Now the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the 
 virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST 
 III) has no IP address.
 Have you attempted to select different available network interfaces?
 
 I have a similar issue when I first started using virtualbox, and it was due 
 to not having the correct interface drop-down option from within the Settings 
 tab on the VirtualBox Gui. (Where all the VMs are listed.)
 
 -- 
 Respectfully,
 
 
 Martes G Wigglesworth
 M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC
 www.mgwigglesworth.net
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org