A dedicated suicide bomber loaded with huge amount of RDX can be quiet
dangerous for a FreeBSD box. Don't panic, Checkout for the detonater in his
pants.
Good Luck
On 1/13/07, Andy Greenwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/12/07, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:48
James Long wrote:
Nathan Vidican wrote:
Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call
me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical
expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network,
heck no opposable digits even
On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Lamont Granquist wrote:
That cat is rather fortunate the server didn't kill the cat at the
same time.
I haven't lived with a cat in awhile, but don't they tend to
'spray' rather than 'stream' so that a direct line of current would
not be established from the
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call
me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical
expertise required whatsoever, no password, no
On Friday 12 January 2007 10:48, Lamont Granquist wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call
me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server;
On 1/12/07, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Lamont Granquist wrote:
That cat is rather fortunate the server didn't kill the cat at the
same time.
I haven't lived with a cat in awhile, but don't they tend to
'spray' rather than 'stream' so that a direct
James Long wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:52 -0800
From: Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
To: Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD-Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,VeeJay
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Nathan Vidican wrote:
James Long wrote:
Yeah, and even a user with no account or password, a screwdriver, and
a Mountain Dew.
Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call
me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical
expertise
this is a funny thread.
On 1/10/07, VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
--
Thanks!
BR / vj
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
Depending on local setup, this could range from 'not at all' to
'extremely'. Do you have a *specific* setup in mind?
Standard user with the root password, a
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client
call
me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical
expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network,
heck no opposable
On Wednesday January 10, 2007 at 07:24:22 (AM) VeeJay wrote:
How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
Well, with a BFH and a sufficient supply of C-4
(cyclotrimethylene-trinitramine),
he/she could be quite dangerous.
--
Gerard
Mail from '@gmail' is rejected and/or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
VeeJay wrote:
Hi
How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
Depends on a number of different factors. For example:
1. What you're running.
2. The number of users who have access to the machine.
3. The data being held.
4. How
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 06:24, VeeJay wrote:
Hi
How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
VeeJay,
I may be wrong (and hope that I am), but your questions are starting to smack
of the sort of questions a teacher would ask at the beginning of a class on
operating systems.
* VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-10 13:24:22 +0100]:
How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
Like another poster mentioned, it depends on a variety of factors. Three
things I can suggest to help you minimize security risks from local
users:
- keep your machine and
On 2007-01-10 13:24, VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
Depending on local setup, this could range from 'not at all' to
'extremely'. Do you have a *specific* setup in mind?
___
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-01-10 13:24, VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
Depending on local setup, this could range from 'not at all' to
'extremely'. Do you have a *specific* setup in mind?
Standard user with the
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:52 -0800
From: Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?
To: Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD-Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,VeeJay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID
18 matches
Mail list logo
