On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:45:31AM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
I am considering switching our production server from 4.9 to 5.2.
production means that it serves some 20 people at our university
institute.
Unfortunately the machine crashes occasionally which would be tolerable
if it was
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Certainly. You will find it better suited to the large filesystems
you have than UFS1. I also have a vague feeling that background fsck
is a UFS2 feature, but I can't find documentation to either confirm or
deny that.
I'm sure this is right. If one of my 5.* machines
However the fsck of our 300+500 GB RAIDs
takes almost an hour and that's why i want to switch to 5.x because it
fscks in the background.
Hi
FreeBSD 4.9 can fsck in the background too, look /etc/defaults/rc.conf
Set in /etc/rc.conf
fsck_y_enable=YES
roberto
The machine is an ASUS
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:49:34AM +, Peter Risdon wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Certainly. You will find it better suited to the large filesystems
you have than UFS1. I also have a vague feeling that background fsck
is a UFS2 feature, but I can't find documentation to either confirm or
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:49:34AM +, Peter Risdon typed:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Certainly. You will find it better suited to the large filesystems
you have than UFS1. I also have a vague feeling that background fsck
is a UFS2 feature, but I can't find documentation to either confirm
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 07:22:04AM -0300, Roberto Pereyra typed:
However the fsck of our 300+500 GB RAIDs
takes almost an hour and that's why i want to switch to 5.x because it
fscks in the background.
Hi
FreeBSD 4.9 can fsck in the background too, look /etc/defaults/rc.conf
Set
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 07:22:04AM -0300, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
However the fsck of our 300+500 GB RAIDs
takes almost an hour and that's why i want to switch to 5.x because it
fscks in the background.
FreeBSD 4.9 can fsck in the background too, look /etc/defaults/rc.conf
Set in
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:49:34AM +, Peter Risdon wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Certainly. You will find it better suited to the large filesystems
you have than UFS1. I also have a vague feeling that background fsck
is a UFS2 feature, but I can't find documentation
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
FreeBSD 4.9 can fsck in the background too, look /etc/defaults/rc.conf
Set in /etc/rc.conf
fsck_y_enable=YES
all that does is to automatically answer Y whenever fsck asks you a
question. it still doesnt make fsck happen in the background as the
