RE: IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT ignored by recent kernel/world?

2004-07-04 Thread JJB
Verbose limit is a sysctl knob now, you can display it to see
current setting or change it without a reboot. Check your
newsyslog.conf file to very the rotate trigger is the same as you
were using before.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT ignored by recent kernel/world?


Hello,

I have one PC with updated kernel/world from June 25th, and another
from June 10th,
all with sources for STABLE.

Both PCs have a firewall. Neither of the two seems to obey the
verbose limit of 100,
that I put in the kernel configuration file.

In the past, /var/log/secure used to rotate once a week or so, but
now it does in
less than 30 minutes due to the overwhelming amount of firewall
logs.

The kernel configuration has following lines, related to the
firewall:

   options IPDIVERT
   options IPFW2   # version 2 IPFW
   options IPFIREWALL  # firewall
   options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE  # enable logging to
syslogd(8)
   options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100# limit verbosity
   options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT# allow everything by
default

and I have in /etc/make.conf:

   IPFW2=TRUE


Any idea what is going wrong here?

Thanks,
Rob.


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT ignored by recent kernel/world?

2004-07-04 Thread Rob
Dan Pelleg wrote:
I have a patch for that in kern/46080. Note I haven't tested it in a while
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/46080
So what I observed (security logfile get floaded with ipfw2 logs) is actually
a kind of bug. If so, I'd rather wait till the fix makes it into the official
sources. If not, then I won't change my own sources.
Work around for now could be to add a logamount statement to each of the
logging rules of ipfw2. Right?
Thanks!
Regards,
Rob.
PS: does this problem also occur in CURRENT, which uses by default IPFW2 ?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT ignored by recent kernel/world?

2004-07-04 Thread JJB
Adding an logamount option to each logging rules would be to long
way work around.
Adding net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=100 to /etc/sysctl.conf would be
the short way.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT ignored by recent
kernel/world?

Dan Pelleg wrote:
 I have a patch for that in kern/46080. Note I haven't tested it in
a while

 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/46080


So what I observed (security logfile get floaded with ipfw2 logs) is
actually
a kind of bug. If so, I'd rather wait till the fix makes it into the
official
sources. If not, then I won't change my own sources.

Work around for now could be to add a logamount statement to each
of the
logging rules of ipfw2. Right?

Thanks!

Regards,
Rob.

PS: does this problem also occur in CURRENT, which uses by default
IPFW2 ?


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT ignored by recent kernel/world?

2004-07-04 Thread Rob
JJB wrote:
Adding an logamount option to each logging rules would be to long
way work around.
Adding net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=100 to /etc/sysctl.conf would be
the short way.
You're right with IPFW, but you missed Dan Pelleg's note that this seems
not to work with IPFW2; for some reason IPFW2 ignores the verbose_limit
setting in the kernel and defaults to net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=0
when logamount is not there; so unlimited logging.
Adding logamount explicitly with each log rule, will work around this
bug for the moment.
NOTE: it only seems to affect IPFW2.
Rob.
Dan Pelleg wrote:
I have a patch for that in kern/46080. Note I haven't tested it in
a while
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/46080

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]