Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I can't recall for certain, but not so long ago, I either read or heard
> about IPFW having implicit keep-state and check-state.
>
> Is it true that I can now omit these keywords in my rulesets?
>
Haven't used IPFW in years so I do not know about IPFW.
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I can't recall for certain, but not so long ago, I either read or heard
> about IPFW having implicit keep-state and check-state.
>
> Is it true that I can now omit these keywords in my rulesets?
keep-state is not implicit. check-state is not generally necessary,
because d
