On Monday 19 January 2004 17:22, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
You've pretty much wore out the play with the config files route.
Let's try getting some data by finding out what is actually happening
so we can figure out what's wrong. Can you post what the traffic on the
other interface
On Sunday 18 January 2004 10:36, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
ipfw add fwd netconnexion1_gw ip from DMZ/netmask to any
ipfw add fwd netconnexion2_gw ip from LAN/netmask to any
Allright people.
So I'm still trying to make my setup working (using IPFILTER).
Thanks for the help you gave, I finally
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Chris Knipe wrote:
I have a service set up, some.host IN A A.A.A.x (i.e. in network A and
gateway A). Now, the moment some one from network B connects to the
service I've setup on network A, the FreeBSD Box will route the reply
packets out on network B (because of
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:25:01AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Now, it does NOT work...
192.168.1.0 -- Internet works with no problem (tun0 being the default route
on the FreeBSD gateway)
192.168.0.0 -- Internet doesn't work :(
When you tcpdump both external interfaces, do the packets on
On Monday 19 January 2004 16:21, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
When you tcpdump both external interfaces, do the packets on
the interface that the 1921.68.0.0/24 network is supposed to use look
like you would expect?
Nope... there's nothing on the external interfaces from the 192.168.0.0/24
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:04:50PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Monday 19 January 2004 16:21, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
When you tcpdump both external interfaces, do the packets on
the interface that the 1921.68.0.0/24 network is supposed to use look
like you would expect?
Nope...
On Sunday 18 January 2004 06:15, Dinesh Nair wrote:
you can do this with IPFW's fwd rulesets.
ipfw add fwd netconnexion1_gw ip from DMZ/netmask to any
ipfw add fwd netconnexion2_gw ip from LAN/netmask to any
Well, somehow, this never worked for me yet :(
But well, I'll try again on monday :)
On Sunday 18 January 2004 06:10, Dinesh Nair wrote:
what i do today is i set the default route to the ISP i am more convinced
off, with static routes of certain large CIDR address blocks going out to
the other ISP. i decided on those large blocks after checking the global
route tables, AS PATH
On Sunday 18 January 2004 06:10, Dinesh Nair wrote:
what i do today is i set the default route to the ISP i am more convinced
off, with static routes of certain large CIDR address blocks going out to
the other ISP. i decided on those large blocks after checking the global
route tables, AS
On Sunday 18 January 2004 10:54, Chris Knipe wrote:
I have a service set up, some.host IN A A.A.A.x (i.e. in network A and
gateway A). Now, the moment some one from network B connects to the
service I've setup on network A, the FreeBSD Box will route the reply
packets out on network B
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Chris Knipe wrote:
I have a service set up, some.host IN A A.A.A.x (i.e. in network A and
gateway A). Now, the moment some one from network B connects to the
service I've setup on network A, the FreeBSD Box will route the reply
packets out on network B (because of the
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
I have one ethernet -- router and one ethernet -- dsl modem
connections to connect to my ISPs. As you said, you're not sure about
routed... Actually, I did not find anyone who actually make this
i've got exactly the same setup as you do, and am
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
What I'm hoping to do is find a way to route all paquets coming:
- from DMZ to internet, using NET connexion1
- from LAN to internet, using NET connection2
To be more understandable, something like this:
route add from DMZ defaut em0
route add
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Antoine Jacoutot schrieb:,
What I'm hoping to do is find a way to route all paquets coming:
- from DMZ to internet, using NET connexion1
- from LAN to internet, using NET connection2
To be more understandable, something like this:
On Thursday 15 January 2004 16:41, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Thats easy on your router:
#!/bin/sh
gateway1=10.10.10.1
gateway2=10.10.10.2
dmz=10.10.20.0/24
lan=10.10.30.0/24
ipfw add fwd ${gateway2} ip from ${dmz} to any
ipfw add fwd ${gateway1} ip from ${lan} to any
Thanks... but the thing is
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:10:01PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Thursday 15 January 2004 16:41, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Thats easy on your router:
#!/bin/sh
gateway1=10.10.10.1
gateway2=10.10.10.2
dmz=10.10.20.0/24
lan=10.10.30.0/24
ipfw add fwd ${gateway2} ip from ${dmz} to any
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 14:42, budsz wrote:
1. With FreeBSD can do like this?, example with route(8)?
2. Does FreeBSD support more than 1 as defaut gateway in routing table??
3. I found some options in /etc/default/rc.conf like static_routes=,
if I use static_routes= _WITHOUT_ defaut
I've been looking for answers on this for a while but I found nothing nor
no-one who could tell me if and how it is possible.
Let the list know if you find anything interesting.
Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra
(/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org)
I'm no
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:46, Simon Gray wrote:
Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra
(/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org)
I'm no expert, but the majority if ISPs tend to use BGP and/or OSPF.
Yes, but one said that for BGP you had to work directly ith
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot typed:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:46, Simon Gray wrote:
Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra
(/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org)
I'm no expert, but the majority if ISPs tend to use BGP
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:46:28PM -, Simon Gray wrote:
I've been looking for answers on this for a while but I found nothing nor
no-one who could tell me if and how it is possible.
Let the list know if you find anything interesting.
Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:00, Ruben de Groot wrote:
I'm not entirely sure (never used it myself), but I think you can use
routed(8), depending on the way you connect to your ISPs.
I have one ethernet -- router and one ethernet -- dsl modem connections to
connect to my ISPs.
As you said,
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:30, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
I'm a heavy Zebra (migrating to Quagga) user. Using dynamic routing is
very handy, but it won't solve the problem of balancing load across two
connections.
Thanks for the feedback :)
So you can't round-robin between two default
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:30, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
I'm a heavy Zebra (migrating to Quagga) user. Using dynamic routing is
very handy, but it won't solve the problem of balancing load across two
connections.
Thanks
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 19:50, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
On FreeBSD, source-based routing is done with the IPFW 'fwd' command (or
the IPFilter 'pass out quick on int_2 to int_1' syntax) rather that
using the `route` command. I'm doing that myself (with IPFilter) and it
works well. It's
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:10:19PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 19:50, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
On FreeBSD, source-based routing is done with the IPFW 'fwd' command (or
the IPFilter 'pass out quick on int_2 to int_1' syntax) rather that
using the `route`
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 21:42, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
If you're using IPFilter, you might be interested in the HOWTO:
http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ipf-howto.html
The section on the to keyword is unfortunately very brief.
Yes I already checked this and as you said, it was poor
27 matches
Mail list logo
