On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:43:22 +1100
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrt to QEMU,i don't think is fast enough to make it worth it - i think you'd
gain more by moving a bit to the side of freebsd for the host and using other
options (linux+ Vmware + freebsd as guest)
I meant this in
On Thursday 20 December 2007 12:54:36 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:43:22 +1100
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrt to QEMU,i don't think is fast enough to make it worth it - i think
you'd gain more by moving a bit to the side of freebsd for the host
and using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, December 20, 2007 14:57:41 +0200 Nikos Vassiliadis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark, what do you need to virtualize and what your requirements are?
As mentioned in my original, we provide VPS hosting, so we're virtualizating
the
On Thursday 20 December 2007 15:57:05 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I think the question about virtualization is far too broad.
For example, you mentioned quotas. I think you can bypass storage
control problems, using seperate devices for each client filesystem.
Just create n vnode md(4) devices
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, December 20, 2007 16:37:19 +0200 Nikos Vassiliadis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UFS2 does not initialize inodes at newfs time as UFS did. So, things
are much better now!
root:0:~# truncate -s 10G jail.00
root:0:~# mdconfig -at
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:18:30 -0400
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'k, but that still doesn't address the problem ... being able to setquota's
on
directories within a jail environment ... or does it?
Note that I'm not looking to quota the VPS itself, only allow software *in*
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:30:44 -0400
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ...
Right now, I'm using jail to provide VPS solutions, but have found some
situations where jail just doesn't work (recently, tried Plesk and due to it
