Hello,
On 20-May-2012, at 3:00 AM, User Wojtek wrote:
the problem is that what i found is not this.
all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. it
doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and still
same.
Are your ports up to date?
all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. it
doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and still
same.
Are your ports up to date? Also, did you apply any funky compile time flags?
yes and no.
But i found the answer.
when i use xdm
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Google find many things with javaldx failed.
Is a problem with
On 05/22/12 14:45, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
The OpenOffice.org package is a big one and consumes a lot of bandwith.
Therefore some may not be available.
Try to build OpenOffice.org from ports. It takes time, be patient.
ok, attempting that...
After copying the jdk-6u3-fcs... files that it
Never mind...
Not sure how to get around the issue posted, but a portupdate solved the
problem -- now building apache-oo instead of oo
On 05/23/12 18:06, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 05/22/12 14:45, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
The OpenOffice.org package is a big one and consumes a lot of bandwith.
Hello Gary Aitken,
1. I'm assuming that since pkg_add looks for the tarball, it is
supposed to exist. Is that a valid assumption?
It is sort of. Have look at
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/All/
2. Anyone know why the tarball isn't there? Should I be
On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote:
[wojtek@wojtek ~/robod]$ openoffice-3.4.0
[Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument
(elements.cxx).javaldx failed!
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
compiled fine, installed without
the problem is that what i found is not this.
all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it.
it doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and
still same.
On Sat, 19 May 2012, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote:
On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:
I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to
LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open Solaris?
Thanks.
Hi,
It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
packages, but I
Abiword: Otherwise I would be using that and ignoring Openoffice.
Ted can do RTF and has few deps.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:08 AM, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:
I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to
LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open Solaris?
Thanks.
Hi,
It has been a
On 28/12/2010 14:42, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:08 AM, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:
I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to
LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
I have been fishing around at all the old sites where I found
it some years ago and can't seem to
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:57:59 -0500, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
Hi,
It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
I have been fishing around at all the old sites where I found
it some years ago and can't seem
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 03:21:35 +0100, Daniel C. Dowse dcdo...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi, that is where i dwnld my oo pkg.
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ -
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/
and I had no problems whatsoever with dwnld and installing it.
I've
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:57:59 -0500
Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
Hi,
It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
By the way I tried Abiword and could not read in a plain text file -
one with just
Ah, I see.
I should learn about all those java licenses some day. I thought there
was a free java somewhere.
Thanks,
Antonio
On 28/07/2010 18:26, Jack L. wrote:
Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being
Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being built
automatically (java). That's why there's a seperate site for them.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Antonio Vieiro
anto...@antonioshome.net wrote:
D'oh! Are those
Jack L. xxjack1...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being
built automatically (java). That's why there's a seperate site
for them.
The 8.1 package collection on freebsd.org includes OOo
I'll see about compiling binaries with certain configurations ;) Need
to add a few more hard drives to my mirrors to accomodate this!
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:46 -0500, Andrew Gould andrewlylego...@gmail.com
wrote:
Compiling
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Vieiro
anto...@antonioshome.net wrote:
Hi all,
For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
official package yet):
This:
D'oh! Are those the official packages? pkg_add -r -v openoffice3 didn't
work from the command line (that's why I posted this, just in case
there're any other newbies reading this ;-)).
Cheers,
Antonio
On 27/07/2010 17:15, Jack L. wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Vieiro
Quoth Antonio Vieiro on Monday, 26 July 2010:
Hi all,
For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
official package yet):
This:
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
From
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Chip Camden
sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
Quoth Antonio Vieiro on Monday, 26 July 2010:
Hi all,
For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
official package yet):
This:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:46 -0500, Andrew Gould andrewlylego...@gmail.com
wrote:
Compiling OpenOffice is not a practical option for many of us due to
hardware restraints.
I'm glad to see that there's a compiled binary somewhere!
Additionally, there's also the problem of the various
On 03/23/10 17:31, Sean McAfee wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working
OO first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.
Regards,
O. Hartmann
You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a
binary backup.
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:09:36 +
O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de articulated:
Just for the record: deleting OO 3.1.1 via pkg_delete and trying to
install new OO 3.2 fails at the same point as before.
OO creates files in the $HOME and other directories that are not
automatically
Hi,
Did you tryed to uninstall OpenOffice and install the new one?
László
From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 11:10:56 AM
Subject: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build
On 03/23/10 17:27, Dánielisz László wrote:
Hi,
Did you tryed to uninstall OpenOffice and install the new one?
László
*From:* O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
*To:* freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
O. Hartmann wrote:
As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO
first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.
Regards,
O. Hartmann
You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a binary
backup. If you can't get 3.2 installed, you
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Sean McAfee
smca...@collaborativefusion.com wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO
first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.
Regards,
O. Hartmann
You can use `pkg_create -b
On 23.03.2010 11:10, O. Hartmann wrote:
I have trouble building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running
FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an
existing installation of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the
error below.
On another box, also running
didn't realise there is a freebsd-openoffice list! sorry for the noise
2009/6/6 John . comp.j...@googlemail.com:
Hello list,
--
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Robert Huff wrote:
Jon writes:
Have you had any success getting openoffice working? I have a similar
problem with xorg 7.4 and openoffice.org-000310_m1. Upon attempting to
run openoffice, I get:
$ openoffice.org-OOO310_m1
Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Trying to run OO-3.0.1 crashes OO with the following error messages and
ends into and enless loop trying to restart and crashing again:
...
(soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment
with non-zero page size is deprecated Xlib: extension
Jon writes:
Have you had any success getting openoffice working? I have a similar
problem with xorg 7.4 and openoffice.org-000310_m1. Upon attempting to
run openoffice, I get:
$ openoffice.org-OOO310_m1
Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :0.0.
Xlib:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:35:43 -0500
Aryeh M. Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you recompile OO after installing xorg-7.4?
Yes, xorg was updated some days ago. I upgraded OO yesterday.
--
The only thing better than love is milk.
___
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Trying to run OO-3.0.1 crashes OO with the following error messages and
ends into and enless loop trying to restart and crashing again:
...
(soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment
with non-zero page size is deprecated Xlib: extension
From: Sebastian Setzer sebastianset...@alice-dsl.net
Subject: RE: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:51:14 +0100
Thanks,
with diablo 1.6 it works.
To the openoffice porting team:
Could you please mention this on http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd
prop oor:name=MacroSecurityLevel oor:type=xs:int
value1/value
/prop
/node
/node
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff
Sent: Thu 1/22/2009 9:54 PM
To: Sebastian Setzer
Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
$ uname -a
FreeBSD grimsqueaker-bsd.pigfarm.org 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD
From: Sebastian Setzer sebastianset...@alice-dsl.net
Subject: RE: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:51:14 +0100
Thanks,
with diablo 1.6 it works.
To the openoffice porting team:
Could you please mention this on http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd
Nikola Lečić [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The OpenOffice.org dictionaries page says:
IMPORTANT NOTE: From OpenOffice.org 3.0 on the dictionary wizard
is not longer available -- Dictionaries are now available via
the extensions repository.
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 18:13 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
I've installed en-openoffice.org-GB-3.0.0 from ports on my 6.4-RC1
system. The install, using the command
portinstall -m LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB -DWITH_KDE
editors/openoffice.org-3, appeared to complete OK and I can
run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:17:25 +
Craig Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 18:13 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
I've installed en-openoffice.org-GB-3.0.0 from ports on my 6.4-RC1
system. The install, using the command
On Friday 07 November 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
Happily, the instruction from the same page (DictOOo-Wizard, intended
for OpenOffice.org-2) worked just fine in my OpenOffice-3. I
downloaded
http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/diction
aries/dicooo/DicOOo.sxw
and
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 22:01 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
Happily, the instruction from the same page (DictOOo-Wizard, intended
for OpenOffice.org-2) worked just fine in my OpenOffice-3. I
downloaded
On Sunday 10 August 2008 17:43:23 Warren Liddell wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 7.0-CURREENT all ports/src upto date as of this
morning.. when trying to compile oo below is the result during the make.
What seems ot be causing this error ?
2 module(s):
icu
openssl
need(s) to be
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3 (openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1)
does build with
Chris Whitehouse wrote the following, On 06/16/08 14:20:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3
did well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this
sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
In case it's any use to
I think your best bet (if you want to use OO) is to use PC-BSD. There is
a PBI package already available for it.
Just my two cents,
Bono Vince Malum
--
-Camilo
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:44:55 +
From: O. Hartmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
I am not able tohelp but just to confirm this is due to libxml2 not
being found right (note to
I can confirm the error. I tried rebuilding everything I could think of
in my installed ports, but the error remains the same:
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util
dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
Tim Kellers writes:
I can confirm the error. I tried rebuilding everything I could think of
in my installed ports, but the error remains the same:
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util
dmake: Error code 1, while
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 20:16:09 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
When I try to install OO from the ports I get the message Environment
error: JAVA_HOME should not be defined.
Does anyone know how to get rid of this?
Thanks,
Marco
unset JAVA_HOME
make install
--
Mario Lobo
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:27:47 -0300
Mario Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unset JAVA_HOME
make install
Yes, this seems to work. Thanks.
Marco
--
If the weather is extremely bad, church attendance will be down.
If the weather is extremely good, church attendance will be down.
If the bulletin
errors on starting up scalc
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
Do you have one?
yes i do. And i wonder why it showed up there in the first place.
I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale en_US
There is no such locale en_US, but e.g. en_US.UTF-8; can you
Hi,
I mistakenly forgot to add the errors i get. I can open any OO program, but
as soon as i open a document, i get this
errors on starting up scalc
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale en_US
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:34:05 +0300
Mike Barnard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
errors on starting up scalc
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
Do you have one?
I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale en_US
There is no
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
(BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/editor
s/
-- have you considered trying them?)
I tried this about a week ago without much success. I could get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:18:57 +
Mike Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
(BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
According to what can be read on the page I sent with my previous
mail, it seems to be a GTK-related issue. I confirm that all 7-stable
OpenOffice packages (including 2.3.1_1) work perfectly on my plain
7.0-RELEASE/i386 install, but with
Hi,
Apologies for not responding sooner, i have been away since last week.
Eduardo, i installed if from ports
Which gcc version do you use? I recall that someone described similar
symptoms on FreeBSD/amd64 with OpenOffice.org compiled using gcc-4.1.
It was a bug in gcc-4.1; recompiling with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:55:56 +0300
Mike Barnard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 7.0 Pre-Release on an HP 6720s Laptop. I am
experiencing a strange problem with OpenOffice.
Every time i open a document/spreadsheet or
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
--
What George Washington did for us was to throw out the British, so
that we wouldn't have a fat, insensitive government running our
country. Nice try anyway,
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did gcc 4.2 get
uninstalled after build?
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did
On Monday 24 September 2007 19:08:28 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
But libstdc++.so.6 isn't under /usr/local, it's under
/usr/compat/linux/usr/lib.
what's the output of:
ls /var/db/pkg|grep gcc
gcc-4.2.2_20070905
gcc-ooo-3.4.1_2
gccmakedep-1.0.2
and:
find /usr/local -name 'libstdc++*'
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did
On Monday 24 September 2007 20:01:51 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Strange, there seem to be more instances of libstdc++.so.6 than when I
search for the file with locate.
For future ref: locate uses a cache, built weekly using periodic(8). Find
searches the disk live, so locate is faster but can be
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Robert Huff wrote:
Marco Beishuizen writes:
After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
this messages:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found, required
by javaldx
Compiling and installation went
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
went ok.
How did you do that?
Regards,
Chris
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Christian Baer wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
went ok.
How did you do that?
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:43:39 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
this messages:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found, required
by javaldx
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found,
In response to NetOpsCenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aloha,
I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are
located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives
error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from
outside. But the files listed
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to NetOpsCenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aloha,
I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are
located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives
error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from
outside.
NetOpsCenter writes:
Bill Moran wrote:
Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X?
So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file
names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it
finishes its part.
1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing list?
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using
2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager.
The time to crash crash changes depending on what is done:
- Writer
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200
Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using
2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official
Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2,
installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The time to
crash crash changes depending on what is done:
- Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds)
-
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200
Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_
experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1).
Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and try.
I attached my
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:13:52 +0200
[LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2,
installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The time to
crash crash changes depending on
Stroganov A. V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello
I've FreeBSD 6.2 prerelease for amd64. When i start OOo, which i
installed using package from Good-Day, these messages are printed:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found, required
by javaldx
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
This hack presumably results in a broken slidesorter, but at least
Writer seems to work (after a fashion), and that's all I really need.
Since the *.obj are just empty sentinel files indicating that the
corresponding *.o have been built, this
# cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0
#
--- Perry Hutchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone seen this and know how to get past it?
Configuring out the failing component would be fine,
if possible, since I really only need the word
processor.
Making:
../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
g++-ooo -fmessage-length=0
Perry Hutchison writes:
Anyone seen this and know how to get past it?
Configuring out the failing component would be fine,
if possible, since I really only need the word processor.
Making: ../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
g++-ooo -fmessage-length=0 -c -Os -fno-strict-aliasing
Making: ../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
...
g++-ooo: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
...
dmake: Error code 1, while making
'../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start it:
GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid
argument' during
Perry Hutchison writes:
Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start it:
GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid argument'
during
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:
Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start it:
GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error
On Wed, 6 Sep 06 17:37:36 PDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:
Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start it:
GThread-ERROR **: file
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Michael Hughes wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 06 17:37:36 PDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:
Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I saw an email that suggested that the problem is that the epm that
comes bundled with the openoffice source has a problem with argument
lines that are too long.
Changing the name of the ports directory to /usr/p fixed it for me.
Thanks, Thanks, Thanks and
Pete C [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trying to setup openoffice 1.1.5 on a FBSD6.1 box (pkg was added
during install) and just wondering about where to install what . . .
there a multiple accounts on the one machine that need access . . . do
I do a Local Install as root (to /usr/local/bin ???
Pete C [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trying to setup openoffice 1.1.5 on a FBSD6.1 box (pkg was added
during install) and just wondering about where to install what . . .
there a multiple accounts on the one machine that need access . . . do
I do a Local Install as root (to /usr/local/bin ???
Subhro wrote:
On 6/2/06, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/1/06, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrea Venturoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I reported it several months ago and all I got to be told was that
it's a strange problem.
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Looks kind of like a problem that was fixed within the last few
days when the port was updated to the next release candidate.
Try updating your ports?
Looks kinda not.
I've got 2.0.3rc3 and I have the same problem.
I reported it several months ago and all I got to be
Andrea Venturoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I reported it several months ago and all I got to be told was that
it's a strange problem.
Well, that's true...
Do you have devel/epm installed by any chance?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 6/1/06, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrea Venturoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I reported it several months ago and all I got to be told was that
it's a strange problem.
Well, that's true...
Do you have devel/epm installed by any chance?
No I do not have epm installed.
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
