Re: Perl: Why not updated to latest version 5.10.0

2009-02-04 Thread Lokadamus
Jerry wrote: I subscribe to the port@ list as well as this one obviously and I do not remember seeing that article. I will keep looking. http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/ -- Archiv of maillinglist :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Perl: Why not updated to latest version 5.10.0

2009-02-04 Thread Tim Judd
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Lokadamus lokada...@gmx.de wrote: Jerry wrote: I subscribe to the port@ list as well as this one obviously and I do not remember seeing that article. I will keep looking. http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/ -- Archiv of maillinglist :) I remember commenting on

Re: Perl: Why not updated to latest version 5.10.0

2009-01-21 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:58:44 -0500 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: I was wondering if anyone can tell me why Perl was not updated to the latest stable release; i.e. 5.10.0 rather than 5.8.9 recently? This was discussed within the last 2-3 weeks, either here or on

Re: Perl: Why not updated to latest version 5.10.0

2009-01-21 Thread William Gordon Rutherdale
As a newcomer to freebsd and a long time Perl user, this was one of the first things I noticed. 5.8.8 as distributed on freebsd 7.1 is extremely old. -Will Jerry wrote: I was wondering if anyone can tell me why Perl was not updated to the latest stable release; i.e. 5.10.0 rather than 5.8.9