Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there some regular interval at which new ports are processed by the
FreeBSD team? I submitted a port (for a very minor utility) 3/20/2008
but it is still not in the tree. I'm not complaining in the slightest -
the folks who do this work are volunteering their time, and I
Charlie Sorsby wrote:
Charlie Sorsby wrote:
[ ... ]
PS It would be really helpful if each port/package at freebsd.org
had an indication whether it requires the latest and greatest
version of freeBSD. Put another way, it would be nice to know the
oldest version of freeBSD it will work with.
Tom Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm using FreeBSD 5-STABLE installed from 5.4-RC1 and then cvsup'd to
5-STABLE on Friday.
Maybe I'm just doing something wrong, but I noticed that when I did
pkgdb -F or portsdb -Uu, it seemed to complain about build
dependancies missing for packages
-
From: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pierre LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: Question about ports
Pierre LeBlanc wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to the port collection and updating ports with CVSup
Pierre LeBlanc wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to the port collection and updating ports with CVSup but I managed to
update the ports of my FreeBSD 4.10 system using CVSup.
Now, I want to upgrade Perl to version 5.6 and I notice there is a perl5 port
in the list I`ve seen on:
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 12:04, Payne wrote:
Hi,
I am want to install postnuke but when-ever I go to do make under
/usr/port/www/postnuke, it wants to install mod_php4 again, I don't want
to have to reinstall ports everytime I add something new.
Thanks,
Payne
Does postnuke require a
I am want to install postnuke but when-ever I go to do make under
/usr/port/www/postnuke, it wants to install mod_php4 again, I don't want
to have to reinstall ports everytime I add something new.
I recently installed PHPNuke and have some observations that might be
relevant to your situation.
Given PHPNuke's security track record, I would say that this is sound
advice. I would suggest going from the latest source as well.
Chris
Matt Staroscik wrote:
I am want to install postnuke but when-ever I go to do make under
/usr/port/www/postnuke, it wants to install mod_php4 again, I don't
Did you try
make install FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes clean
See
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+5.1-RELEASE+and+Portsformat=html
Many people don't know to use the =yes for FORCE_PKG_REGISTER.
After you get Postnuke installed you may have to make these
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello :)
I have 2 questions concerning the ports.
1. I need to apply a patch to a port so my modem could work with
mgetty+sendfax; how do I do that ? Do I have to edit the Makefile or
pass options to the make command ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:25, you wrote:
Just to give you an example.
a) If I want to have the FreeBSD php4-port is able to work with
thttpd, I have to update the lang/php4/Makefile and
lang/php4/bsd.php.mk to recognize a new flag for the port
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:25, you wrote:
[...]
In fact I wanted to try adding an option in mgetty, like:
if WITH_USR=yes, then patch the mgetty source
This usually went this way, even if I don't want to prevent you from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:51, Jens Rehsack wrote:
This usually went this way, even if I don't want to prevent you from
asking the ports maintainer to accept/commit your patch. Usually you
create the patch against mgetty, send this patch to the
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:51, Jens Rehsack wrote:
This usually went this way, even if I don't want to prevent you from
asking the ports maintainer to accept/commit your patch. Usually you
create the patch against mgetty, send
14 matches
Mail list logo
