Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD
system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other
subnet is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here is a
diagram of my network, I think it's fairly typical.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabian Keil
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:58 AM
To: Jason Morgan
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am setting up
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:03:11AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabian Keil
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:58 AM
To: Jason Morgan
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing
Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD
system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other
subnet is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here
Do you have gateway_enable=YES in your rc.conf?
Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE
Director of Information Services
Mason General Hospital
http://www.masongeneral.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif
Expire
default70.183.13.193 UGS 024701xl0
10/24 link#3 UC 00 fxp0
10.0.0.1 00:d0:b7:44:f9:c6 UHLW0 903lo0
10.0.0.2
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:03:26AM -0800, Brian E. Conklin wrote:
Do you have gateway_enable=YES in your rc.conf?
Yes, I do. The FreeBSD works fine for routing to the outside, it's
between the subnets where I run into issues.
Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE
Director of Information Services
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:25:25AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif
Expire
default70.183.13.193 UGS 024701xl0
10/24 link#3 UC 00 fxp0
10.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:03 AM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:25:25AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Destination
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:03 AM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
On Tue
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
And again, tcpdump is a very good tool. The -i switch tells it what
interface to listen on, so if the wireless side of the router works
but you can't ping across to the cabled side, then
Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings
on the Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now
connect to systems in each of the two subnets and I also have
routing to the outside world from both subnets. My only
remaining issue is getting to the web app setup
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:37:16PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
And again, tcpdump is a very good tool. The -i switch tells it what
interface to listen on, so if the wireless side of
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:42:27PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings
on the Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now
connect to systems in each of the two subnets and I also have
routing to the outside world from
I never explicity set the FreeBSD machine to enable NAT
between these subnets. Should I do so? Do I just add another
natd_interface to rc.conf?
You do not want to do this. The below config in rc.conf is correct. It
states that nat will only be enabled for the external interface, for
both
On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Jason Morgan wrote:
...
Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings on the
Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to
systems in each of the two subnets and I also have routing to the
outside world from both subnets. My only
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:10:44PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Jason Morgan wrote:
...
Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings on the
Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to
systems in each of the two subnets and I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 6:47 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:10:44PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:49:54PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 6:47 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
Bingo, it was the static route. The wireless router didn't
like getting connection attempts from 10.0.0.0 addresses.
Turns out, the FreeBSD machine was operating as advertised.
Now it's time to get IPSEC set up.
Awesome :)
You have any q's in your new venture that aren't related to
20 matches
Mail list logo
